Re: Travis burns : Tue Aug 26, 2014 4:08 am
saint at wire wrote:
May I put in a lone voice of dissent here without being pounced on?
I am not excited about Burns coming to Saints, I rate him as above average but that's all.
It leaves the question; if not Burns then who - and I really do not know the answer to that , but it looks a bit like panic buying.
surely there are some good rookies in the NRL who can't get in the 1st team but are better than anything we have over here?
I am not excited about Burns coming to Saints, I rate him as above average but that's all.
It leaves the question; if not Burns then who - and I really do not know the answer to that , but it looks a bit like panic buying.
surely there are some good rookies in the NRL who can't get in the 1st team but are better than anything we have over here?
I would hardly call it a panic buy. We've not had a recognised 6 for 3 -5 years depending on your point of view.
A very slow panic buy.
Above average maybe accurate. It may not. I'm not an officionardo on Burns but having a proper 7 and 6 is what most people are excited about. There are others who follow it closer and are excited about the player. But for me it's having a balanced side for the first time in nearly 5 years.