Re: Travis burns : Sun Aug 24, 2014 10:00 am  

St pete wrote:

But at the end if the day, that agent has made his client a helm of alot of cash.

indeed, and thats his job, but he could have easily done that without getting his client abused

Re: Travis burns : Sun Aug 24, 2014 10:27 am  

Saint Simon wrote:

indeed, and thats his job, but he could have easily done that without getting his client abused

Agreed.

Re: Travis burns : Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:18 am  

So who was his agent?

I seem to recall it was Offiah when Eastmond extended his contract at Saints but by the time he left he had switched agents. Was his new one Clark's brother?

Re: Travis burns : Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:57 am  

St pete wrote:

He was wrong to show the fingers to the fans and that basically was the end of him at saints no matter what but was the fans right to get on his back for him wanting to go?

That was only part of it, prior to that McManus put in a good new contract offer, Eastmond became more indecisive as his agent seemed to have already made his mind up where his client is going to go.
That indecision and agent invovement "miffed" McManus to no end, the end point was Eastmond became very unprofessional and spit his dummy out, afterwards James Graham showed how it should have been done with transparency and playing 100% up to his last game.

Re: Travis burns : Sun Aug 24, 2014 12:43 pm  

Eastmond had already made his mind up that he was going to Rugby Union back in 2009. I don't know of it's still available (mods) but check my post around about 1st August 2009 on him.

Re: Travis burns : Sun Aug 24, 2014 3:53 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

Eastmond had already made his mind up that he was going to Rugby Union back in 2009. I don't know of it's still available (mods) but check my post around about 1st August 2009 on him.

It appears to be consigned to history.

Re: Travis burns : Sun Aug 24, 2014 4:30 pm  

BackrowSaint wrote:

It appears to be consigned to history.

Travis Burns Thread
Last 27 posts on Eastmond

He's been left years, move on and get back to Saints

Re: Travis burns : Sun Aug 24, 2014 5:48 pm  

wirefox wrote:

Travis Burns Thread
Last 27 posts on Eastmond

He's been left years, move on and get back to Saints

t may have got a little derailed, but the reason we're scrabbling about for Burns, who is a great player but hardly the future of saints is because of past decisions.

What to do after next year? Walsh will probably be off (hopefully after a successful season) and we'll still be a halfback and a backup hooker down!

Re: Travis burns : Mon Aug 25, 2014 2:20 pm  

Saint Simon wrote:

t may have got a little derailed, but the reason we're scrabbling about for Burns, who is a great player but hardly the future of saints is because of past decisions.

What to do after next year? Walsh will probably be off (hopefully after a successful season) and we'll still be a halfback and a backup hooker down!

Walsh has the option of another year after the next , maybe having his good mate Travis here to keep him company will influence him to take it. We will also need to see how Walsh recovers from his injury, even when he is training and gets back playing his full recovery may take a considerable time.

I'd love to think the club is thinking a few years ahead but given how we've been caught out so badly in the recent past I'm not convinced

Re: Travis burns : Tue Aug 26, 2014 12:19 am  

May I put in a lone voice of dissent here without being pounced on?

I am not excited about Burns coming to Saints, I rate him as above average but that's all.

It leaves the question; if not Burns then who - and I really do not know the answer to that , but it looks a bit like panic buying.
surely there are some good rookies in the NRL who can't get in the 1st team but are better than anything we have over here?