Sam Buca II wrote:
They are, yes, but Leeds & McDermott are now as one. You're writing Leeds' chances off because McDermott is in charge.
I am writing off Leeds for a few reasons and one of them will be because McDermott is in charge. This does not mean that I am writing off McDermott as a coach. If I was writing off McDermott as a coach I would say "McDermott is never going to be a good coach".
McDermott needs to develop more before taking on a position as coach at a club with the pedigree and expectations of Leeds which is bloody obvious if you ask me. It could be a once in a lifetime opportunity for the man (in the same way it was for Darryl Powell) so I can understand why he wouldn't want to pass it up.
In my business world you have to prove yourself capable of managing a small area effectively before you will get the opportunity to take on a role that is bigger with more responsibility. In my analysis of McDermott he has managed a small area with limited effectiveness. Has he been effective enough to suggest that he can manage something bigger? Not from where I'm stood. If he'd turned Harlequins RL into consistent top eight material then there is a case for him getting the Leeds job. He hasn't, therefore I see little in your argument to counter what I am stating. It's pretty obvious to me, however I understand why you choose to not see it.