FearTheVee wrote:
Funny that when compared to some of the comments on the Gelling thread on your board, such as:
"I really like Gelling, I'm made up he's getting his chance. It does leave me wondering where this leaves Goulding though with Gelling and Sarginson seemingly nailing the centre spots."
You've barely got any more injuries than Saints.
To be fair first choice centres on current form or form before they were injured would be Thornley and Gelling. It also seems that they are next years first choice pairing. If you were to go on squad numbers it would be Goulding and Thornley. Sarginson is definitely NOT first choice at this stage although he is first reserve utility back.
Definitely out are Mcllorum, Farrell, Pettybourne, Clubb, Green, Thornley who would definitely be in the first choice 17, plus Goulding, Crosby and Hampshire who would be first reserves. We also don't know the O'Loughlin situation as the last couple of times he has been named in the 19 he didn't make the field. Bateman has a sternum injury but is playing. Obviously the wisdom of that will soon become clear.
Whether that constitutes a crisis or not is open to personal interpretation. I am wiling to bet, though, that if we took the equivalent players out of the Saints team and put 4 or 5 of ours back in to the team you'd be saying we had an undoubted advantage going into the game. What's more, you'd be absolutely right.