Re: team for friday v widnes : Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:03 am  

SaintsFan wrote:

Let's look at the alternative, the one which reflects what I actually said, by way of an imaginary (but perfectly possible) conversation:

Coaches: 'Where do you feel happiest playing, Franny?'

Franny: 'On the wing'

Coaches: 'Ok then. Wing it is.'

You've totally and utterly lost your mind. I'm not joking either! Since the day saints sacked Royce Simmons you've become so bitter it's unreal!

Simmons was a man who was out of his depth big time, he looked clueless of how to get us out of the worst run saints had been on in god knows how many yeas, he'd lost the dressing room, lost the support of fans and lost the support of McManus.

Sine the sacking, we've lost one game against 2nd in the league, we are in the next round of challenge cup more importantly we are playing for each other again.

Weve appointed a top class coach in Nathan brown for next year and your still not happy!

It's obvious you like TV shows like conspiracy theories because this crazy theory youve come up with about "collective coaching" is just utter madness.

I'd love to hear your take on who shot JFK, was the world rmtrade centre blew up by the americans, the Bermuda triangle and the titanic.

Re: team for friday v widnes : Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:10 am  

St pete wrote:

You've totally and utterly lost your mind. I'm not joking either! Since the day saints sacked Royce Simmons you've become so bitter it's unreal!

You drunk again Pete?

Re: team for friday v widnes : Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:17 am  

SaintsFan wrote:

:lol:

You drunk again Pete?

I'd say yes, just slightly and serious hangover but you've still lost your marbles.


And just to let you know before you ask me after, I'll be on it again at 1pm

Re: team for friday v widnes : Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:22 am  

MickeyMo wrote:

Are you mad? How long have you been watching Saints? Do you have any idea what the Saints way of playing is?

I asked the question. Is it like we played under Millward or under Anderson or what? You responded with more questions rather than giving me an answer. I assume you don't know?

Re: team for friday v widnes : Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:24 am  

St pete wrote:

I'd say yes, just slightly and serious hangover but you've still lost your marbles.

Are you suggesting I had marbles in the first place? Clearly you don't know me!

Re: team for friday v widnes : Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:26 am  

Talk Some Sense! wrote:

No i'm not confusing anything. We're doing lots of things differently now and players are given different direction under the current coaches, I know that for a fact too so it's unfortunately not something thats open for debate.

Everything is open for debate.

With regards to your experience issue, anybody who isn't so obsessed with Royce Simmons would be able to tell you that experience in the team has been key,

You brought him up; I didn't.

I want an experienced coach in charge, not two people who have virtually no experience at all, regardless of who they are.

Re: team for friday v widnes : Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:37 am  

SaintsFan wrote:

Everything is open for debate.

You brought him up; I didn't.

I want an experienced coach in charge, not two people who have virtually no experience at all, regardless of who they are.

I'd rather to Inexperinced (is rush Inexperinced) than having a complete idiot who took us on our worst ever run and made us a joke at our new home which resulted in booing the tran off.

Re: team for friday v widnes : Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:43 am  

BackrowSaint wrote: Just because you're expressing your opinion it doesn't mean you aren't making it up. If you think the two are mutually exclusive you're even more stupid than I thought. If you say so. You're going to get your name on the famous board in pizza hut at this rate. http://www.redvee.net/forums/showthread ... -on-rlfans I've seen the thread already and I think it's really funny (but somewhat childish). I'm flattered that the posters think me worthy enough of a thread all to myself. It's like schoolyard stuff, much as some of the comments on here are. I guess some people never grow up. One of them certainly doesn't realise how fortunate he was that I didn't take things in a different direction, and he will know who he is. And to Luckysaint: there was a good reason I blocked you on Twitter but don't take it too personally.

BackrowSaint wrote: Just because you're expressing your opinion it doesn't mean you aren't making it up. If you think the two are mutually exclusive you're even more stupid than I thought. If you say so. You're going to get your name on the famous board in pizza hut at this rate. http://www.redvee.net/forums/showthread ... -on-rlfans I've seen the thread already and I think it's really funny (but somewhat childish). I'm flattered that the posters think me worthy enough of a thread all to myself. It's like schoolyard stuff, much as some of the comments on here are. I guess some people never grow up. One of them certainly doesn't realise how fortunate he was that I didn't take things in a different direction, and he will know who he is. And to Luckysaint: there was a good reason I blocked you on Twitter but don't take it too personally.

Re: team for friday v widnes : Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:45 am  

St pete wrote:

I'd rather to Inexperinced (is rush Inexperinced) than having a complete idiot who took us on our worst ever run and made us a joke at our new home which resulted in booing the tran off.

Rush is inexperienced at first grade level yes. He has only one season at assistant level (he was assistant to Daniel Anderson for a season when our assistant left and before the new one was appointed).

As for booing the team off: that happened under Potter and according to relatives who have been watching Saints for 60 plus years, has happened many, many times over the years. Saints fans have traditionally booed the players when unhappy with performances, so I'm told.

Re: team for friday v widnes : Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:06 am  

SaintsFan wrote:

Rush is inexperienced at first grade level yes. He has only one season at assistant level (he was assistant to Daniel Anderson for a season when our assistant left and before the new one was appointed).

As for booing the team off: that happened under Potter and according to relatives who have been watching Saints for 60 plus years, has happened many, many times over the years. Saints fans have traditionally booed the players when unhappy with performances, so I'm told.

Not nice in the new home tho.