Re: Chris Hill ???? : Fri Jul 08, 2011 4:55 pm  

Shame really

Re: Chris Hill ???? : Fri Jul 08, 2011 5:16 pm  

It's no great shock to be honest. Warrington are investing in their team and we are dismantling ours.

Warrington have ambition and we dont. When they are in finals and winning cups at least we can say we've developed young players and finished 6th.

Re: Chris Hill ???? : Sat Jul 09, 2011 7:40 am  

Chris Hill's wife gets a job in Warrington Club Shop on £150,000 sealed the deal

Re: Chris Hill ???? : Sat Jul 09, 2011 8:35 am  

St pete wrote:

It's no great shock to be honest. Warrington are investing in their team and we are dismantling ours.

According to rumour we were interested in both Waterhouse and Hill. Only rumour mind. But if the rumour was accurate, how can you accuse Saints of dismantling their team? It may simply be that Wire have a special Wolves salary cap limit enabling them to out bid everyone else. That probably isn't the first time that has happened. Weren't we interested in Carvell at one time?

Re: Chris Hill ???? : Sat Jul 09, 2011 9:03 am  

Waterhouse and Hill. Anymore you think you can sign?

Re: Chris Hill ???? : Sat Jul 09, 2011 9:05 am  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

And again Wire fail to "grow their own".

from a goon..priceless

wind your neck in poppit and think back to a time when all Maurice Lindsay had to do to get all the top talent was bend over....deary me.

Re: Chris Hill ???? : Sat Jul 09, 2011 9:07 am  

Rommel wrote:

Chris Hill's wife gets a job in Warrington Club Shop on £150,000 sealed the deal

Jealousy is VERY UGLY...why don't you grow some and just admit that the best place to be a young player at the moment is Warrington.

Re: Chris Hill ???? : Sat Jul 09, 2011 9:53 am  

SaintsFan wrote:

According to rumour we were interested in both Waterhouse and Hill. Only rumour mind. But if the rumour was accurate, how can you accuse Saints of dismantling their team? It may simply be that Wire have a special Wolves salary cap limit enabling them to out bid everyone else. That probably isn't the first time that has happened. Weren't we interested in Carvell at one time?

I'm talking over last 5 years. We have had many players leave and not so many come in.

I don't know why the club just don't be honest and say we are doing it on the cheap.

Re: Chris Hill ???? : Sat Jul 09, 2011 11:01 am  

St pete wrote:

I'm talking over last 5 years. We have had many players leave and not so many come in.

I don't know why the club just don't be honest and say we are doing it on the cheap.

I think you are over reacting slightly, we can't sign waterhouse as we are over the quota on non-federation, Hill seams to be a loss but we did keep TP when Warrington where after him. It's only after TP and Laffranci were secured by Saints and our quota filled, that Warrington sucure Waterhouse. As for Hill the fans where after him, but taking it from another thread about pryce, there was no reports from Saints being after him and Leigh have not mentioned nor the player that any other clubs where in for him.

Re: Chris Hill ???? : Sat Jul 09, 2011 11:10 am  

bewareshadows wrote:

I think you are over reacting slightly, we can't sign waterhouse as we are over the quota on non-federation, Hill seams to be a loss but we did keep TP when Warrington where after him. It's only after TP and Laffranci were secured by Saints and our quota filled, that Warrington sucure Waterhouse. As for Hill the fans where after him, but taking it from another thread about pryce, there was no reports from Saints being after him and Leigh have not mentioned nor the player that any other clubs where in for him.

I think your missing the point slightly. I know we can sign waterhouse as our overseas is full. I'm more concerned that we've not recruited quality players for the last 5 years and next year our recruitment looks to be over.

It looks to be, pryce, Graham, flattery, eastmond and Gardner out and lance and laffranchi in.