Re: 19 man Squad v Huddersfield : Wed Feb 03, 2016 9:37 pm  

Turner did ok at 6 in the few games he did there but he's never a 6 in a million years. I hope he puts fages there but imo Burns should get picked at 6 to start.

Re: 19 man Squad v Huddersfield : Wed Feb 03, 2016 11:09 pm  

Is that article for real?? Sounds like a bore fest to open the season. Not the attitude surely to be talking about percentages/the arm wrestle?! Doesn't bode well.

I don't see the logic in signing Fages and not playing him at 6 with burns out. Instead we are putting a centre there who hasn't got a passing or kicking game? We would be going with effectively one hb who will be under even more pressure.

Re: 19 man Squad v Huddersfield : Thu Feb 04, 2016 7:42 am  

St pete wrote:

Turner did ok at 6 in the few games he did there but he's never a 6 in a million years. I hope he puts fages there but imo Burns should get picked at 6 to start.

Don't like Turner at 6, he's no attacking threat at 6 would sooner have him at 3 the lesser of the 2 evils. We've got Walsh, Burns and Fages battling for the half back spots, Percy, Turner and Peyroux battling for centre position, Lomax, McDonnell and Owens battling for the full back. Can't see the point of a player being out of position unless we have a pile of injuries.

Re: 19 man Squad v Huddersfield : Thu Feb 04, 2016 7:59 am  

I thought Turner was a better 6 than burns towards the back end of the season as burns seemed to have lost his mojo after the first 8 or so games( probably after his face was smashed).

However that's fine when he is your only choice to replace burns but Fages is proven at this level and will benefit from a freer role at 6.

Putting Turner at 6 suggests to me a huge lack of trust in his defence, so much so they are willing to sacrifice his proven strike record for a safe pair of hands.

So Peyroux will need to up his game before the fans start calling for Turner to be moved back as he's not exactly setting hearts or minds alight so far.

Huddersfield always start well and despite bedroom antics in the off season will be well drilled.

Re: 19 man Squad v Huddersfield : Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:21 am  

i want exciting, expansive rugby more than anyone. I moaned about it enough last season but he's right, you have to play the conditions (and they're awful at the min) by giving your forwards momentum and direction. 2 fresh interchange hookers will provide you with that.

Win the arm-wrestle, try and get some points on the board and then the confidence will come to chance their arm a bit by using a bit of width when they're 8+ and not 8 behind and desperately trying to get back into it.

Re: 19 man Squad v Huddersfield : Thu Feb 04, 2016 2:35 pm  

I'd like to see us go

Owens
Makinson
Percival
Turner
Swift
Fages
Walsh
Amor
Roby
Tasi
Vea
Greenwood
Wilkin

Walmsley
Savelio
LMS
Thompson

I think KC will go

Owens
Makinson
Peyroux
Percival
Swift
Turner
Walsh
Amor
Roby
Tasi
Vea
Wilkin
LMS

Savelio
Walmsley
Greenwood
Richards/Fages

I hope i'm wrong and Theo is 6. Turner offers very little at 6 apart from barging over the line when close enough. If he's not at centre he shouldn't be in there for me.

Re: 19 man Squad v Huddersfield : Thu Feb 04, 2016 11:46 pm  

I've been told Fages and Greenwood miss out. Turner at 6. If true KC had better hope we win, if not then its pitch fork time.

Re: 19 man Squad v Huddersfield : Fri Feb 05, 2016 1:09 am  

LFC Saint wrote:

I've been told Fages and Greenwood miss out. Turner at 6. If true KC had better hope we win, if not then its pitch fork time.

Surely that cannot be true?

Interesting to see Warrington's drastic improvement over last season tonight. Surprisingly they look a competent and dangerous side now, amazing what investing in improving your squad can do. We on the other hand seem hell bent on alienating the fans and annoying as many people as humanly possible. The quotes from KC this week don't bode well and nor do the rumours about team selection. If Peyroux is a starting centre for us this year, we're in for a tough time.

Re: 19 man Squad v Huddersfield : Fri Feb 05, 2016 6:25 am  

LFC Saint wrote:

I've been told Fages and Greenwood miss out. Turner at 6. If true KC had better hope we win, if not then its pitch fork time.

I'd be disappointed if true, Greenwood is a strike forward which every team needs and Fages should be starting at 6.

Re: 19 man Squad v Huddersfield : Fri Feb 05, 2016 1:14 pm  

bewareshadows wrote:

I thought Turner was a better 6 than burns towards the back end of the season as burns seemed to have lost his mojo after the first 8 or so games( probably after his face was smashed).

However that's fine when he is your only choice to replace burns but Fages is proven at this level and will benefit from a freer role at 6.

Putting Turner at 6 suggests to me a huge lack of trust in his defence, so much so they are willing to sacrifice his proven strike record for a safe pair of hands.

So Peyroux will need to up his game before the fans start calling for Turner to be moved back as he's not exactly setting hearts or minds alight so far.

Huddersfield always start well and despite bedroom antics in the off season will be well drilled.

We lost 0-19 to Hull FC first up last year.

Having said that we do look better prepared this year.

Looking forward to some live rugby.