Re: Disciplinary Charges : Mon Jun 16, 2014 4:43 pm  

FearTheVee wrote:

I didn't see the Walmsley incident - was he provoked?

Both players were like Big Girls! it took place nowhere near the ball.

Re: Disciplinary Charges : Mon Jun 16, 2014 4:51 pm  

I don't think Walmsley or Pellisier should be banned. It was handbags that was settled with a sinbinning each, I'd say that's punishment enough.

Re: Disciplinary Charges : Mon Jun 16, 2014 6:44 pm  

I can't wait to see the outcome of these three charges after the Peacock cockup.

Re: Disciplinary Charges : Mon Jun 16, 2014 7:11 pm  

FearTheVee wrote:

I've no idea whether he will or not, but he's probably one of the cleanest, most disciplined forward in world RL so hopefully the disciplinary will take that into account.

I agree, as you say James is one of the cleanest & disciplined players in the game.

Re: Disciplinary Charges : Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:03 am  

Fatbelly wrote:

It never pleases the Good Honest Folk of Warrington to see any player on a disciplinary charge. But I bet James doesn't get a ban.

By the way you can only address Super Ben as Super Ben if you wear the Cherished Primrose & Blue. To mere mortals its Mr Westwood.

NO! To the rest of Rugby league he is 'That Dirty Ba$%£rd'.

Re: Disciplinary Charges : Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:37 am  

bilko1941 wrote:

I can't wait to see the outcome of these three charges after the Peacock cockup.

What Peacock cock up?

Did I miss something. Would loved to have been there.

Or are you talking about the ban, where an un distinguished disciplinary record was taken into account?

Re: Disciplinary Charges : Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:52 am  

Top Saint wrote:

'That Dirty Ba$%£rd'.

I've watched Super Ben throughout his Warrington career and I truly don't think he is a Dirty B******.
He is a rough uncompromising forward, who gives 100%in every match. He does get targeted for a bit extra of attention from opposing teams but Super Ben laughs this off like water off a Ducks back.

His reputation comes from one punch on a Pie player in last seasons Grand Final, that was seen by Sky viewers on replay but missed by the match official's.

Re: Disciplinary Charges : Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:59 am  

Fatbelly wrote:

I've watched Super Ben throughout his Warrington career and I truly don't think he is a Dirty B******.
He is a rough uncompromising forward, who gives 100%in every match. He does get targeted for a bit extra of attention from opposing teams but Super Ben laughs this off like water off a Ducks back.

His reputation comes from one punch on a Pie player in last seasons Grand Final, that was seen by Sky viewers on replay but missed by the match official's.

Give over. He is as dirty as they come. Cheap shots all over the place, and some offences far worse than the one last season.

However, he is not the only player like that, who will take advantage, and he does take hits aswell. And I for one would love him in my side, whether like that or not.

Re: Disciplinary Charges : Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:59 am  

SmokeyFag wrote:

What Peacock cock up?

Did I miss something. Would loved to have been there.

Or are you talking about the ban, where an un distinguished disciplinary record was taken into account?

Undistinguished indeed!

The only reason Peacock hasn't had bans is because in previous years a bit of biff hasn't been a banning offence!

Re: Disciplinary Charges : Tue Jun 17, 2014 1:45 pm  

FearTheVee wrote:

I didn't see the Walmsley incident - was he provoked?

I'd say there was some unintentional provocation.

It was off the ball and Pelissier seemed to accidentally barge into him, knocking him onto his backside. When big Jim got up, there was a bit of push and shove then a couple of punches thrown. Ref sin binned them both which should be the end of the matter.

Roby might have a case to answer but even that is doubtful.