St pete wrote:
He's been s*it on at saints at times IMO. Always the scapegoat when things not gone out way. Some fans have even called him a a disgrace and not fit to wear the shirt. I disagree!
From day one he was asked to play a position he's not used to. We might have got away with it if we had a halfback with him but we had young lad in lomax and a Second row in Jon Wilkin partnering more often than not.
This year he's go Walsh with him. He's looked a decent 6 with Walsh. We know he's not a proper 6 but IMO he's the best 6 at the club.
Lance has two shown major flaws as a stand off.
1) When receiving the ball at 2nd receiver, he's often seen crabbing sideways, which destroys any space for the men outside that we'd created earlier in the play.
2) He's a bit of a panicker when defending outwide.
Whilst he'll probably never completely shake either of these, they can be improved on the training field and by giving him the same job week in / week out.
He can certainly be a danger with the ball and he can create a bit too.