Re: Amor to be banned? : Sun Mar 23, 2014 11:24 pm  

Magic Superbeetle wrote:

They'd convinced themselves they'd won before the game had kicked off, and we only made it worse by having a poor first half. This is the problem of repeatedly playing teams who pulverise London the week before. They seem to think it will have some baring on how they play against a team like saints. Happened at hull too.

I doubt there would of been a second word said about Amor, lomax the "dying swan", ganson being in the refs room or anything else had Wakefield got the 2 points today.

Exactly. Poor reaction from the Wakefield club in general today.

Having said that, I fear the worst re.Wilkin and I can see him getting a ban which would leave us struggling massively for next Friday.

Re: Amor to be banned? : Sun Mar 23, 2014 11:51 pm  

The Yellow Giraffe wrote:

Exactly. Poor reaction from the Wakefield club in general today.

Having said that, I fear the worst re.Wilkin and I can see him getting a ban which would leave us struggling massively for next Friday.

I see little choice other than to promote charnock in that case!

Of course, it's worth baring in mind, that given the lack of facilities at BV there's only gonna be a couple of camera angles at best, and who knows what they'll show.

Re: Amor to be banned? : Sun Mar 23, 2014 11:57 pm  

Magic Superbeetle wrote:

I see little choice other than to promote charnock in that case!

Of course, it's worth baring in mind, that given the lack of facilities at BV there's only gonna be a couple of camera angles at best, and who knows what they'll show.

Wheeler should be available so that's one of the two half back slots sorted. I'd rather see Hohaia or Lomax in the other place rather than Wellens.

I realise that Lomax is more dangerous at 1 but I think 1 and 7 combo of Makinson/Lomax is better than Lomax/Wellens.

Re: Amor to be banned? : Mon Mar 24, 2014 12:00 am  

The Yellow Giraffe wrote:

Wheeler should be available so that's one of the two half back slots sorted. I'd rather see Hohaia or Lomax in the other place rather than Wellens.

I realise that Lomax is more dangerous at 1 but I think 1 and 7 combo of Makinson/Lomax is better than Lomax/Wellens.

A worst case team would look something like

Makinson
Dawson Percival jones swift
Wheeler lomax
Laffranchi Roby Walmsley
Flanaghan Manu
Wellens

Hohaia soliola masoe Richards

?

My concern with reshuffling again is that there are no kickers in that team, which is why I'd feel compelled to give charnock the nod.

Re: Amor to be banned? : Mon Mar 24, 2014 12:25 am  

The Yellow Giraffe wrote:

Get beat did we?

You tried to slow us down all day with your spoiling attics and it was only in the 2nd half that the ref finally started to take action.

This sour grapes nonsense is quite embarrassing.

Thanks for your observations. We got done rather than beat. Roby was truly inept, one call that was a peach was for interference when poor willie plain dropped the ball. Kirmond was stood upright 3-4ft away from him - still good luck against leeds - if you get roby reffing the game you are a shoe in, if not well I cant see anything other than a sound beating. I will be putting my hard earned on the whinos - lots of it.

Re: Amor to be banned? : Mon Mar 24, 2014 8:09 am  

worksopwildcat wrote:

Thanks for your observations. We got done rather than beat. Roby was truly inept, one call that was a peach was for interference when poor willie plain dropped the ball. Kirmond was stood upright 3-4ft away from him - still good luck against leeds - if you get roby reffing the game you are a shoe in, if not well I cant see anything other than a sound beating. I will be putting my hard earned on the whinos - lots of it.

Re: Amor to be banned? : Mon Mar 24, 2014 9:29 am  

Interesting how the last time Roby reffed Saints (was it HKR at home?), that we were complaining about him too - is he just incompetent?!

Re: Amor to be banned? : Mon Mar 24, 2014 10:01 am  

worksopwildcat wrote:

Thanks for your observations. We got done rather than beat. Roby was truly inept, one call that was a peach was for interference when poor willie plain dropped the ball. Kirmond was stood upright 3-4ft away from him - still good luck against leeds - if you get roby reffing the game you are a shoe in, if not well I cant see anything other than a sound beating. I will be putting my hard earned on the whinos - lots of it.

Re: Amor to be banned? : Mon Mar 24, 2014 12:25 pm  

Shaft wrote:

Interesting how the last time Roby reffed Saints (was it HKR at home?), that we were complaining about him too - is he just incompetent?!

Yes

Re: Amor to be banned? : Mon Mar 24, 2014 12:26 pm  

Your all forgeting the EARLY GUILTY PLEA is it worth using for this match or save it incase we need him later in season? (assuming he's guilty)