Re: Team selection - post Royce : Mon Mar 19, 2012 6:34 pm  

1984saints wrote:

I would I give Cunningham the job on is own the players have a lost more respect for him then they have for rush

Really????


Rush coached most of them.



Cunningham has been an assistant conditioner, I would take it as more of a team effort, rather than one being number one, the other being number 2. Also Cunningham may not want it yet.

Re: Team selection - post Royce : Mon Mar 19, 2012 6:48 pm  

[quote="bewareshadows"]Really????


Rush coached most of them.
Rush coached a few of them as kids ya but the problem lies with the others players how well they take to him he aint played or coached at a high level he coached at junior's level which is a big step up to first team[/quotem

Re: Team selection - post Royce : Mon Mar 19, 2012 6:48 pm  

St pete wrote:

Still fooked in the halves no matter what team is picked because he had this crazy idea of signing a fullback as a halfback.

My pack

LMS
Roby
Perry
Sia
Wilkin
Laffranchci

Subs- clough, TP, flanaghan, Dixon

come on Pete, you need to pick the halves not just the pack.

Re: Team selection - post Royce : Mon Mar 19, 2012 6:53 pm  

bewareshadows wrote:

come on Pete, you need to pick the halves not just the pack.

I ain't got a clue what I'd pick as no combinations have worked this year at all. I don't think lance or lomax are #7 but who else is there?

I'd have to go with Gaskell at stand off as he's the most natural halfback at the club and the only one with a long kicking game (poor this year).

This would have all been avoided if we'd just signed a #7 on.

Re: Team selection - post Royce : Mon Mar 19, 2012 7:01 pm  

St pete wrote:

I ain't got a clue what I'd pick as no combinations have worked this year at all. I don't think lance or lomax are #7 but who else is there?

I'd have to go with Gaskell at stand off as he's the most natural halfback at the club and the only one with a long kicking game (poor this year).

This would have all been avoided if we'd just signed a #7 on.

I would say Gaskell is a more natural 7 than a 6, would give Wheeler the no 6 shirt, Lomax on the bench coming on in the 2nd half against a tiring defence.

Re: Team selection - post Royce : Mon Mar 19, 2012 7:44 pm  

bewareshadows wrote:

Really????


Rush coached most of them.



Cunningham has been an assistant conditioner, I would take it as more of a team effort, rather than one being number one, the other being number 2. Also Cunningham may not want it yet.

Rush was Andersons assistant, do it may be interesting to see of he coaches in an Anderspn style.

As far as players go, there will be one at least who benefits from this, there always is as a result of a coaching overhaul. Which player is going up grab the opportunity that is available?

Re: Team selection - post Royce : Mon Mar 19, 2012 8:21 pm  

Well it's a long time to our next game so it gives us some time for prep and boy we need it as after Sunday it's a quick turn around for Warrington.

Re: Team selection - post Royce : Mon Mar 19, 2012 8:23 pm  

bewareshadows wrote:

Well it's a long time to our next game so it gives us some time for prep and boy we need it as after Sunday it's a quick turn around for Warrington.

What are you expecting on Sunday?

Saints 2006 revisited?

Re: Team selection - post Royce : Mon Mar 19, 2012 8:28 pm  

SaintsFan wrote:

What are you expecting on Sunday?

Saints 2006 revisited?

I'd settle for Saints 1995 reloaded.

Re: Team selection - post Royce : Mon Mar 19, 2012 8:29 pm  

bewareshadows wrote:

I'd settle for Saints 1995 reloaded.

You aint going to get either.