Re: Shenton on the wing : Mon Jul 04, 2011 1:19 pm  

Saddened! wrote:

Could this be possible?

1 - Makinson
2 - Foster
3 - Meli
4 - Soliola
5 - Shenton
6 - Lance (Leon for rest of this season)
7 - Lomax

I should be coach...

1 - Lance
2 - Foster
3 - Shenton
4 - Soliola
5 - Meli
6 - Wheeler/Gaskell
7 - J-Lo
8 - Perry
9 - Robes
10 - LMS
11 - Wellens
12 - Wilkin
13 - Puletua

14 - Lanaanananafichi
15 - Clough
16 - Moore
17 - TBC new prop

I'm clearly a tactical genius - fact

Re: Shenton on the wing : Mon Jul 04, 2011 1:25 pm  

Saint Simon wrote:

1 - Lance
2 - Foster
3 - Shenton
4 - Soliola
5 - Meli
6 - Wheeler/Gaskell
7 - J-Lo
8 - Perry
9 - Robes
10 - LMS
11 - Wellens
12 - Wilkin
13 - Puletua

14 - Lanaanananafichi
15 - Clough
16 - Moore
17 - TBC new prop

I'm clearly a tactical genius - fact

Meli on the wing? Whats wrong with you?

And there isn't a cat in hells chance Wello is up to starting in the back row. He's too slow for that

Re: Shenton on the wing : Mon Jul 04, 2011 1:27 pm  

Saddened! wrote:

Meli on the wing? Whats wrong with you?

And there isn't a cat in hells chance Wello is up to starting in the back row. He's too slow for that

I'd have put Makinson there but in reality, Meli isnt going to get dropped from the squad.

Re: Shenton on the wing : Mon Jul 04, 2011 1:38 pm  

Saint Simon wrote:

13 - Puletua

I think Lafranchi is your new 13. Playing a role of 3rd prop and doing high minutes.

Re: Shenton on the wing : Mon Jul 04, 2011 1:50 pm  

Offside Monkey wrote:

I think Lafranchi is your new 13. Playing a role of 3rd prop and doing high minutes.

If Perry can get fully fit we should have a very balanced pack, Perry and Puletua as big barges crashing though defences and Lafranchi, Cloughy and LMS more mobile, faster props

Re: Shenton on the wing : Mon Jul 04, 2011 1:58 pm  

Saint Simon wrote:

If Perry can get fully fit we should have a very balanced pack, Perry and Puletua as big barges crashing though defences and Lafranchi, Cloughy and LMS more mobile, faster props

Clough and Perry for yards in the tackle, LMS for impact and quick plays, Tony P for the off loads and Laffranchi for whatever else we need?

Re: Shenton on the wing : Mon Jul 04, 2011 4:07 pm  

If we are naming possible squads, then alot depends on Pryce.

But given that I've accepted the Wellens arguement.

FB - Pryce or Nathan Ashe depends on Pryce signing.
Wing - Foster
Centre - Meli
Centre -Shenton
Wing - Makinson (Gardner has done well this year, BUT Makinson has scored only 3 less in 3 less games with much less game time)
SH - Lance
SO - Lomax (Gaskell and Wheeler stepping in for injury and long term replacement)

Prop - Perry (assuming he is fit for more than 1 match)
Hooker - Roby
Prop - Clough
2nd Row - Soliola
2nd Row - Wilkin
LF - Laffranci

sub
Tony Puletua
LMS
Then any of Moore, Flannery, Wellens, Wheeler and another prop which I think we need incase 1 of our first grade props gets taken down . With Megennis getting the odd game from the bench.

Re: Shenton on the wing : Tue Jul 05, 2011 1:20 pm  

Just to mix it up a bit I'll go:

1. Pryce / Makinson
2. Foster
3. Meli
4. Soliola
5. Shenton

6. Lance
7. Lomax

8. Perry
9. Roby
10. LMS
11. Flannery
12. Wilkin
13. Laffrinchi

14. Puletua
15. Moore
16. Clough
17. Wellens

On Standby:

18. New Prop (hopefully)
19. Gaskell
20. Wheeler
21. Magennis
22. Ashurst
23. Dixon
24. Ashe
25. Forster
26. Hale
etc...

Re: Shenton on the wing : Tue Jul 05, 2011 2:02 pm  

Why would Pryce sign to play fullback?

Bradford and maybe Cats would most likely pay him loads to playin his favoured position. Not to mention he is better than Hohioahaha and Lomax (and Wheeler and Gaskell)

Re: Shenton on the wing : Tue Jul 05, 2011 2:09 pm  

jdrocket wrote:

Why would Pryce sign to play fullback?

Bradford and maybe Cats would most likely pay him loads to playin his favoured position. Not to mention he is better than Hohioahaha and Lomax (and Wheeler and Gaskell)

We know this, no need to rub it in.