Re: Perry up : Tue May 31, 2011 9:49 pm  

SaintsFan wrote:

Right. So out of all the fights that have taken place this season, two pairs have been summoned to the mighty RFL. Pathetic. If they'd been using one guy as a punchbag, I could understand it. Or if one had been on the floor and the other punching his lights out, I could understand it. But the blokes were facing each other and just having a fight. And it wasn't exactly ten rounds in a ring either.

Pathetic.

So you were wrong again.

Like the Whiting two feet on the line and the £2 million.

That was of the top of my head there are probably others. Wasn't there one in a Hull game v Leeds?

As I always say in these situations, let the disciplinary sort it out, that's their job.

Re: Perry up : Tue May 31, 2011 10:29 pm  

SaintsFan wrote:

Bloody ridiculous. I hope Saints make a big thing of this. How many one on one fights between grown men on the rugby pitch have resulted in the two grown men being summoned before the panel? Utter farce.

Bailey brown

Re: Perry up : Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:13 am  

sgtwilko wrote:

Bailey brown

But wasn't Bailey/Brown about Bailey punching Brown rather than a face off? As I remember it, Brown was not in a position to defend himself. Radford was another wrong one, regardless of how we felt about his victim, as he was punching him while on the ground. There are lopsided punchups and there are face offs. Perry and whatsisname were in a man on man, face to face fight, started by the Crusaders guy. I don't think that is the same as Bailey/Brown or the Radford example. To treat it as the same is just stupid. There have been other scraps during matches this season and no-one has ended up in front of the RFL. The RFL is such a joke.

Re: Perry up : Wed Jun 01, 2011 7:40 am  

Do you think they have been waiting for him to have a dust-up?

Re: Perry up : Wed Jun 01, 2011 7:59 am  

Two Wheeled Saint wrote:

Do you think they have been waiting for him to have a dust-up?

Unless Crusaders cited him, I reckon they've used his reputation from the NRL as evidence rather than the video evidence.

Re: Perry up : Wed Jun 01, 2011 8:18 am  

SaintsFan wrote:

But wasn't Bailey/Brown about Bailey punching Brown rather than a face off? As I remember it, Brown was not in a position to defend himself. Radford was another wrong one, regardless of how we felt about his victim, as he was punching him while on the ground. There are lopsided punchups and there are face offs. Perry and whatsisname were in a man on man, face to face fight, started by the Crusaders guy. I don't think that is the same as Bailey/Brown or the Radford example. To treat it as the same is just stupid. There have been other scraps during matches this season and no-one has ended up in front of the RFL. The RFL is such a joke.

Forgive if I'm wrong but how many fights start with people punching at the same time. And as it is brown started it and Bailey finished it by decking brown and nrl hardman o'donnel.

You asked how many people got brought infront of the panel for fighting? The answer is plenty with plenty having a week off.

Re: Perry up : Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:25 am  

sgtwilko wrote:

You asked how many people got brought infront of the panel for fighting? The answer is plenty with plenty having a week off.

Not when compared to the number of fights that have taken place, which was more like my point.

Re: Perry up : Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:39 am  

Nothing wrong with a bit of biff. It was a nothing scrap and they should just be given a warning about future conduct etc etc.

Re: Perry up : Wed Jun 01, 2011 5:56 pm  

No1 Saint wrote:

Nothing wrong with a bit of biff. It was a nothing scrap and they should just be given a warning about future conduct etc etc.

I agree, it was one on one and a nothing fight.

Re: Perry up : Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:34 pm  

How long have saints got to appeal?