Re: top of the league : Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:35 pm  

BackrowSaint wrote:

Sorry, we weren't actually talking about Warrington last week. Never mind though!

You'll soon be looking up at the mighty Wire again. You mark my words.

Re: top of the league : Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:37 pm  

WireWonder wrote:

You'll soon be looking up at the mighty Wire again. You mark my words.

You ever considered stand up comedy as a career?

Re: top of the league : Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:47 pm  

WireWonder wrote:

You'll soon be looking up at the mighty Wire again. You mark my words.

Last warning, behave or begone, your choice

Re: top of the league : Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:56 pm  

Saint Simon wrote:

Last warning, behave or begone, your choice

no..leave him on...his comment's are that weak they crawl out of his mouth.

Re: top of the league : Mon Apr 25, 2011 7:01 pm  

RIGSBY wrote:

no..leave him on...his comment's are that weak they crawl out of his mouth.

even after his amazing wire get smashed by an average hull side after hull had atough derby and wire walked over a dire salford, he's still trolling on here, unbelieveable!

Re: top of the league : Mon Apr 25, 2011 7:03 pm  

Saint Simon wrote:

even after his amazing wire get smashed by an average hull side after hull had atough derby and wire walked over a dire salford, he's still trolling on here, unbelieveable!

Try and say that after a few pints.

Re: top of the league : Mon Apr 25, 2011 7:05 pm  

BackrowSaint wrote:

Try and say that after a few pints.

i just have

Re: top of the league : Mon Apr 25, 2011 7:05 pm  

Saint Simon wrote:

i just have

Re: top of the league : Mon Apr 25, 2011 9:08 pm  

Judder Man wrote:

In makes you think if the standard of the comp is high, competitive yes.

You can't complain about the quality of our last two matches. Both have been sensational.

Re: top of the league : Mon Apr 25, 2011 9:09 pm  

McClennan wrote:

You can't complain about the quality of our last two matches. Both have been sensational.

Surely you aren't including today's match in that?