Re: Eastmond Signs For Bath !! : Tue Mar 01, 2011 12:14 pm  

It's on the Saints Official website now.

Now the next thing is to get ourselves sorted and move on.

Re: Eastmond Signs For Bath !! : Tue Mar 01, 2011 12:30 pm  

Any realistic chance of us securing the services of his replacement soon and cancelling the remainder of Kyles contract?

Re: Eastmond Signs For Bath !! : Tue Mar 01, 2011 12:54 pm  

mistermoo wrote:

Wilkin.

Re: Eastmond Signs For Bath !! : Tue Mar 01, 2011 8:38 pm  

rammsteinbloke wrote:

Any realistic chance of us securing the services of his replacement soon and cancelling the remainder of Kyles contract?

No on the replacement and on what grounds could we cancel his contract.We would have to pay him off.

Re: Eastmond Signs For Bath !! : Wed Mar 02, 2011 4:14 am  

Eastmond is going at the end of the season, and according to him its the challenge he's going for and not the money. may i suggest that if he wanted a challenge in union he should have signed for Leeds union, Sale or Newcastle. now that would have been a challenge.
we all know why he signed for Bath, and it wasn't for the challenge. why doesn't he just admit its the money and nothing else. or does the truth hurt him?

Re: Eastmond Signs For Bath !! : Wed Mar 02, 2011 10:31 am  

Now perhaps that you lot know where you stand things might improve on the field. He should have come clean ages ago and I thought it showed at Friday nights game that there was "tension" between the players.

I think it is a bad move for him but hey, I am sure we would all show our a55es in B&M for the money he is getting.

Will Simmons do the same as McRae did with Myler and not play him for the rest of the season? By the way, who is Eastmonds agent? Is it a certain numpty who is on Sky Sports News every Sunday at 2130 hours?

This might add a tad of credibility to the rumour that I heard recently that Sean Long is going to return sooner rather than later to Saints.

Re: Eastmond Signs For Bath !! : Wed Mar 02, 2011 11:23 am  

Chorley Rhino wrote:

Now perhaps that you lot know where you stand things might improve on the field. He should have come clean ages ago and I thought it showed at Friday nights game that there was "tension" between the players.

I think it is a bad move for him but hey, I am sure we would all show our a55es in B&M for the money he is getting.

Will Simmons do the same as McRae did with Myler and not play him for the rest of the season? By the way, who is Eastmonds agent? Is it a certain numpty who is on Sky Sports News every Sunday at 2130 hours?

This might add a tad of credibility to the rumour that I heard recently that Sean Long is going to return sooner rather than later to Saints.

No it's not Offiah and Longy isn't coming back.
I'd play him into the ground, hospital passes the lot

Re: Eastmond Signs For Bath !! : Wed Mar 02, 2011 11:36 am  

I still question the "heart" of Kyle?? union may be the softer option we will wait and see but I still say Taxi for Eastmond, let Bath take him now and pay him! also give St Helens a fair fee!

Re: Eastmond Signs For Bath !! : Wed Mar 02, 2011 2:00 pm  

jaybs wrote:

I still question the "heart" of Kyle?? union may be the softer option we will wait and see but I still say Taxi for Eastmond, let Bath take him now and pay him! also give St Helens a fair fee!

Kyle wanted his 2011 salary paying up. Keep him and rot him in the reserves.

Re: Eastmond Signs For Bath !! : Wed Mar 02, 2011 2:47 pm  

Ski wrote:

Kyle wanted his 2011 salary paying up. Keep him and rot him in the reserves.

Or hospital pass the b@stard to death..