Re: lima charged : Tue Feb 15, 2011 12:16 am  

handrags wrote:

on the goons forum they say wilkin is a whining wimp/ grass ! but then they said Newtons assault on long was a friendly tap,

I'm a strong believer that terms like 'grass' and 'tell tale' are the inventions of guilty people and cowards who don't like getting caught out and punished for their misadventures and/or are unable/unwilling to accept their guilt.

Re: lima charged : Tue Feb 15, 2011 12:22 am  

McClennan wrote:

I think he'll just get a warning for the chicken wing because I'm not sure it was intentional.

Make that two KFC's wasn't it?

Re: lima charged : Tue Feb 15, 2011 2:14 pm  

Offside Monkey wrote:

I couldn't really make out what Wilkin's complain was about, but it obviously hurt him.
There was one on Soliola that looked worse, which the posters on the Pie forum are attributing to Lima also.

I noticed the Soliola one when it happened, couldn't see anything in the Wilkin one but I assumed that as he'd already done it once in the game, it was possible. You can tell Soliola was a bit more used to those sort of "alleged" tactics, didn't even blink when it happened.

Re: lima charged : Tue Feb 15, 2011 3:17 pm  

inside_man wrote:

I noticed the Soliola one when it happened, couldn't see anything in the Wilkin one but I assumed that as he'd already done it once in the game, it was possible. You can tell Soliola was a bit more used to those sort of "alleged" tactics, didn't even blink when it happened.

That's because Soliola is hard and Wilkin is just a pussy whipped bitch. These tactics are used every game. They only ever come to light when a player vocally expresses his concern to an official, Silverwood had no choice but to include it in his after match report as well as it being picked up on live TV. The outcome will probably be a one match ban and a slap on the wrist, if they make an example out of Lima so early on in the season, the RFL disciplinary panel is going to be very busy this year!

Re: lima charged : Tue Feb 15, 2011 3:23 pm  

warrior24 wrote:

These tactics are used every game.

Every Wigan game perhaps. Most penalised team and player in 2010, don't show much sign of letting up.

Re: lima charged : Tue Feb 15, 2011 3:26 pm  

FearTheVee wrote:

Every Wigan game perhaps. Most penalised team and player in 2010, don't show much sign of letting up.

Nope, all teams do it sunshine. Your'e just to biased to see it. It's a tactic used by all forwards, unfortunately some players see it through more than others.

Re: lima charged : Tue Feb 15, 2011 3:32 pm  

warrior24 wrote:

Nope, all teams do it sunshine. Your'e just to biased to see it. It's a tactic used by all forwards, unfortunately some players see it through more than others.

Re: lima charged : Tue Feb 15, 2011 3:47 pm  

FearTheVee wrote:

Every Wigan game perhaps. Most penalised team and player in 2010, don't show much sign of letting up.

Careful with those stones and glass houses. For misconduct penalties we were the 5th cleanest team. Stains were the 5th dirtiest.

Don't forget that doesn't include the 80% of things you get away with traditionally too.

Although now that Cunningham's retired Super League is officially 30% cleaner than last year. Hey, if Pryce stays injured and you drop Wilkin, that could go as high as 90%!

Re: lima charged : Tue Feb 15, 2011 3:53 pm  

Fishsta wrote:

Careful with those stones and glass houses. For misconduct penalties we were the 5th cleanest team. Stains were the 5th dirtiest.

Don't forget that doesn't include the 80% of things you get away with traditionally too.

Although now that Cunningham's retired Super League is officially 30% cleaner than last year. Hey, if Pryce stays injured and you drop Wilkin, that could go as high as 90%!

Nice try.

We were 3rd in the fair play league and had zero sin bins, zero sendings off and zero match bans.

Wigan were 3rd bottom of the fair play league, the most penalised team in SL, had the most penalised player in SL, 7 sin bins and 3 match bans.

HTH

Re: lima charged : Tue Feb 15, 2011 3:58 pm  

FearTheVee wrote:

Nice try.

We were 3rd in the fair play league and had zero sin bins, zero sendings off and zero match bans.

Wigan were 3rd bottom of the fair play league, the most penalised team in SL, had the most penalised player in SL, 7 sin bins and 3 match bans.

HTH

Misconduct Penalties for Wigan - 40

Misconduct Penalties for Saints - 44

Like I said, don't forget what you regularly get away with on top of that.

HTH.