Re: 2011 : Tue Sep 28, 2010 10:23 pm  

5th would represent a good season for that lot. The backs are a major issue.

Re: 2011 : Tue Sep 28, 2010 10:58 pm  

Wello
Foster
Shenton
Flannery??
Meli??
Eastmond
Pryce
Peri peri sauce
Moore
Graham
Soliola
Wilkin
Roby (think he should do 80 mins)

TP
Clough
Lomax (this guy looks like he could be world class)
LMS

Re: 2011 : Wed Sep 29, 2010 9:18 am  

Saddened! wrote:

5th would represent a good season for that lot. The backs are a major issue.

like this year when wakey were far superior to us? yet we somehow scored the most points of any team in the league?
backs of
1 wellens
2 Foster
3 Shenton
4 Meli
5 Lomax

(swap meli for soliola as required, but id like to see sia in the pack)

isnt the best set of backs in the league, but they're not far off either, and behind what i consider the best pack in the league should be fine

Re: 2011 : Wed Sep 29, 2010 9:20 am  

Noel Cleal wrote:

I agree pretty much with Crusaders9. Here is what I have in my spreadsheet

1. Paul Wellens
2. Jamie Foster
3. Michael Shenton
4. Francis Meli
5. Jonny Lomax
6. Leon Pryce
7. Kyle Eastmond
8. Josh Perry
9. James Roby
10. James Graham
11. Sia Soliola
12. Jon Wilkin
13. Chris Flannery
14. Scott Moore
15. Tony Puletua
16. Louie McCarthy-Scarsbrook
17. Paul Clough
18. Matty Ashurst
19. Shaun Magennis
20. Gary Wheeler
21. Andrew Dixon
22. Lee Gaskell
23. Tom Armstrong
24. Gareth Frodsham
25. Jamie Ellis
26. Jack Bradbury

27. Forster
28. Makinson
29. Ashe

If that first 17 stay reasonably fit 1st is a real possibility

Re: 2011 : Wed Sep 29, 2010 11:06 am  

Here's a post I put on the Wigan site. http://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=472784&start=0 And I forgot Ben Davies A very strong pack SQUAD, add to that a very good set of backs with the likes of Marsh and Charnley as back up, Wigan will be a very difficult team to beat. Oh before some of you get your knickers in a twist, accusing me of trolling, the title of the thread is 2011 (Not Saints squad 2011)

Here's a post I put on the Wigan site. http://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=472784&start=0 And I forgot Ben Davies A very strong pack SQUAD, add to that a very good set of backs with the likes of Marsh and Charnley as back up, Wigan will be a very difficult team to beat. Oh before some of you get your knickers in a twist, accusing me of trolling, the title of the thread is 2011 (Not Saints squad 2011)

Re: 2011 : Wed Sep 29, 2010 11:20 am  

Rogues Gallery wrote: Here's a post I put on the Wigan site. http://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=472784&start=0 And I forgot Ben Davies A very strong pack SQUAD, add to that a very good set of backs with the likes of Marsh and Charnley as back up, Wigan will be a very difficult team to beat. Oh before some of you get your knickers in a twist, accusing me of trolling, the title of the thread is 2011 (Not Saints squad 2011) no twisting here! As i said on that thread, IMO we have a (slightly) better first 17 on balance, but Wigan's strength in depth is impressive, they could withstand a bout of injuries in most positions quite easily, but yet we still did ok this year so its up for grabs! Again, IMO Wire and Leeds look weaker (well older and no strengthening) as a whole as well

Rogues Gallery wrote: Here's a post I put on the Wigan site. http://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=472784&start=0 And I forgot Ben Davies A very strong pack SQUAD, add to that a very good set of backs with the likes of Marsh and Charnley as back up, Wigan will be a very difficult team to beat. Oh before some of you get your knickers in a twist, accusing me of trolling, the title of the thread is 2011 (Not Saints squad 2011) no twisting here! As i said on that thread, IMO we have a (slightly) better first 17 on balance, but Wigan's strength in depth is impressive, they could withstand a bout of injuries in most positions quite easily, but yet we still did ok this year so its up for grabs! Again, IMO Wire and Leeds look weaker (well older and no strengthening) as a whole as well

Re: 2011 : Wed Sep 29, 2010 11:50 am  

Saint Simon wrote:

no twisting here!
As i said on that thread, IMO we have a (slightly) better first 17 on balance, but Wigan's strength in depth is impressive, they could withstand a bout of injuries in most positions quite easily, but yet we still did ok this year so its up for grabs!
Again, IMO Wire and Leeds look weaker (well older and no strengthening) as a whole as well

It may come down to how the new recruits settle in (including your new coach) One concern I have at Wigan is how we will go without Riddell. He has been excellent for us this year and is vastly underrated by a lot of fans .

Then again, how will Saints go without Cunningham?

Let's get Saturday out of the way first though

Re: 2011 : Wed Sep 29, 2010 11:55 am  

well we have two international hookers to replace him, and you have one with a world cup medal, so i doubt either team will be in that much trouble!
Moore getting a full run in his preferred position will only improve his game as well

Re: 2011 : Wed Sep 29, 2010 12:10 pm  

crusaders9 wrote:

Agreed noel...should b a great squad...mix of youth and experience!! Surly a recipe for success
...wat about tony p..bench or starting!!

The balance of our squad does look pretty good. I can see Magennis becoming a starter next year. Dean leaving surely means we will be seeing more of Tom Armstrong at some point.

Regarding Tony P, I can see him being a prop in our squad next year on the basis most of our young players coming through are second rowers. Looking at our Props we have Graham who is an automatic starter and Perry who is a specialist starting Prop i.e. he is more a physical player than a yard maker. Given Tonys ability to bust tackles he would be better used later in the game when defences are not as sharp.

Re: 2011 : Wed Sep 29, 2010 12:21 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote: Here's a post I put on the Wigan site. http://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=472784&start=0 the title of the thread is 2011 (Not Saints squad 2011) OK I'll bite. The relevance of the thread is not the problem it is the relevance of the forum. We have no issue with you talking about Wigan but please at least compare them with St.Helens RLFC (the subject of the forum). Rather than go off on a tangent. For example, this is what I would say... Looking at the Wigan squad in comparison to Saints squad both do look pretty strong. Thanks to both sides youth development and some clever signings Saints and Wigan will have the best and most improved squads next year. It would not surprise me if we are looking at a Lancashire 1,2 in the Super league next year.

Rogues Gallery wrote: Here's a post I put on the Wigan site. http://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=472784&start=0 the title of the thread is 2011 (Not Saints squad 2011) OK I'll bite. The relevance of the thread is not the problem it is the relevance of the forum. We have no issue with you talking about Wigan but please at least compare them with St.Helens RLFC (the subject of the forum). Rather than go off on a tangent. For example, this is what I would say... Looking at the Wigan squad in comparison to Saints squad both do look pretty strong. Thanks to both sides youth development and some clever signings Saints and Wigan will have the best and most improved squads next year. It would not surprise me if we are looking at a Lancashire 1,2 in the Super league next year.