Sia : Tue May 21, 2013 2:11 pm  

http://www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/disciplinary/item?4463 No charge. Big bonus for magic weekend. Wilkin also not charged.

http://www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/disciplinary/item?4463 No charge. Big bonus for magic weekend. Wilkin also not charged.

Re: Sia : Tue May 21, 2013 2:13 pm  

Good because neither were worthy of a charge.

Re: Sia : Tue May 21, 2013 2:24 pm  

Bonus, potentially the same squad plus Robes available for Saturday.

Re: Sia : Tue May 21, 2013 2:33 pm  

I'd say common sense but I doubt that played a part. The random ban generator obviously just worked in our favour this week. Look , anyone can play http://www.mathgoodies.com/calculators/ ... ustom.html

I'd say common sense but I doubt that played a part. The random ban generator obviously just worked in our favour this week. Look , anyone can play http://www.mathgoodies.com/calculators/ ... ustom.html

Re: Sia : Tue May 21, 2013 2:57 pm  

Rightly so, there was nothing in it.

Re: Sia : Tue May 21, 2013 3:35 pm  

Happy with that I thought hed get a match.
Maguire did his best to get him sent off though,went down like a bag of shoite.
When you watched the replay he hit him with his chest more than his shoulder,poor from Maguire imo.

Re: Sia : Tue May 21, 2013 3:58 pm  

Don Brennan wrote:

Happy with that I thought hed get a match.
Maguire did his best to get him sent off though,went down like a bag of shoite.
When you watched the replay he hit him with his chest more than his shoulder,poor from Maguire imo.

Agree with that.
Mags seems to resort to the antics of a footballer these days instead of playing the game that he used to be so good at.
Congratultions on your win btw.

Re: Sia : Tue May 21, 2013 4:25 pm  

Can someone explain this decision to me please? - http://www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/disciplinary/item?4466 Shoulder made contact with the head, therefore should have been a red card following recent bans?

Can someone explain this decision to me please? - http://www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/disciplinary/item?4466 Shoulder made contact with the head, therefore should have been a red card following recent bans?

Re: Sia : Tue May 21, 2013 4:48 pm  

Albion wrote: Can someone explain this decision to me please? - http://www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/disciplinary/item?4466 Shoulder made contact with the head, therefore should have been a red card following recent bans? McQuire contributed to the collision, Sia style of "boom" tackle will always be borderline these days.

Albion wrote: Can someone explain this decision to me please? - http://www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/disciplinary/item?4466 Shoulder made contact with the head, therefore should have been a red card following recent bans? McQuire contributed to the collision, Sia style of "boom" tackle will always be borderline these days.

Re: Sia : Tue May 21, 2013 4:57 pm  

Albion wrote: Can someone explain this decision to me please? - http://www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/disciplinary/item?4466 Shoulder made contact with the head, therefore should have been a red card following recent bans? Player does not use illegal shoulder charge as arm is not tucked into side and is minimal hip rotation. Contact is made with head however opponent contributes to result of tackle by dipping and turning head into contact. Worthy of on field penalty Think that sums it up so why a red card?

Albion wrote: Can someone explain this decision to me please? - http://www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/disciplinary/item?4466 Shoulder made contact with the head, therefore should have been a red card following recent bans? Player does not use illegal shoulder charge as arm is not tucked into side and is minimal hip rotation. Contact is made with head however opponent contributes to result of tackle by dipping and turning head into contact. Worthy of on field penalty Think that sums it up so why a red card?