McIlorum : Fri Apr 06, 2012 5:06 pm  

Looked to produce a fairly carbon copy of wellens and lafranchis tackles from last week. Will be interesting to see if he also gets a ban.

Re: McIlorum : Fri Apr 06, 2012 5:08 pm  

SomersetSaint wrote:

Looked to produce a fairly carbon copy of wellens and lafranchis tackles from last week. Will be interesting to see if he also gets a ban.

He will for sure and so will hohaia.

Re: McIlorum : Fri Apr 06, 2012 5:09 pm  

His was worse than Laffranchis. He came down almost vertically and he drove it down. The rfl will not do a thing no doubt.

Re: McIlorum : Fri Apr 06, 2012 5:11 pm  

Saddened! wrote:

His was worse than Laffranchis. He came down almost vertically and he drove it down. The rfl will not do a thing no doubt.

Was a penalty given for Laffranchi tackle last week?

Re: McIlorum : Fri Apr 06, 2012 5:18 pm  

Saddened! wrote:

His was worse than Laffranchis. He came down almost vertically and he drove it down. The rfl will not do a thing no doubt.

God you have a blinkered view, the legs were barely verticle and the only the reason the legs went slightly above verticle was due to Hansen coming in on the upper body. The tackle to the letter of the law may get a ban but it certainly wasnt dangerous. Normally id put such stupid blinkered remarks down to a few post game sherberts then i saw who posted and take it it as standard as someone who really has no clue about anything RL

Re: McIlorum : Fri Apr 06, 2012 5:20 pm  

St pete wrote:

Was a penalty given for Laffranchi tackle last week?

No I don't think so. Saying that the Wigan player deserves two for that one he did as it was far worse.

Re: McIlorum : Fri Apr 06, 2012 5:23 pm  

Agent Mulder wrote:

No I don't think so. Saying that the Wigan player deserves two for that one he did as it was far worse.

As the previous poster mentioned I think Hansen made it worse than it was going to be, but McIlorum shouldn't be lifting in the first place. Any player who has to appear before the disciplinary on a 1-2 match ban, will just make the guilty plea and miss the cup weekend, no great punishement there.

Re: McIlorum : Fri Apr 06, 2012 5:27 pm  

Agent Mulder wrote:

No I don't think so. Saying that the Wigan player deserves two for that one he did as it was far worse.

Right, my thinking of that then, if wello and Laffranchi both didn't concede a penalty as it wasn't seen by the ref but both copped a ban, then why did Bentham not send the Wigan player off?

He seen it, he awarded and penalty and (I think) put it in repor so if he seen it and these type of tackles warrant a ban then he should have been sent off.

Re: McIlorum : Fri Apr 06, 2012 5:31 pm  

Meefy wrote:

As the previous poster mentioned I think Hansen made it worse than it was going to be, but McIlorum shouldn't be lifting in the first place. Any player who has to appear before the disciplinary on a 1-2 match ban, will just make the guilty plea and miss the cup weekend, no great punishement there.

Is there not a weekend disciplinary, therefore he'll be banned for Monday?

Re: McIlorum : Fri Apr 06, 2012 5:42 pm  

SomersetSaint wrote:

Is there not a weekend disciplinary, therefore he'll be banned for Monday?

According to the RFL's website its on Wednesday/Thursday and covers both lots of fixtures.