Jack Bradbury : Wed Nov 10, 2010 2:04 pm  

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 176199.stm signs for Oldham, good luck to him

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 176199.stm signs for Oldham, good luck to him

Re: Jack Bradbury : Wed Nov 10, 2010 3:56 pm  

Has anyone seen him play? There is a guy at work who is an Oldham fan, very close to the running of the club. He reckons Bradbury is a quality player and his stop in NL for a year is just that, a year until a Super League team can make space for him at centre. Reckons he's far too good to be playing in the National Leagues. He said there has been a lot of unhappy players at Saints in general with better prospects overlooked in favour of egos in terms of youth promotion.

Seems a tad strange we've let another outside back go, Armstrong too, when ours are so utterly terrible, bar Shenton.

Re: Jack Bradbury : Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:04 pm  

Saddened! wrote:

Has anyone seen him play?

He got a first team call up for one away match but never played.

I think the choice of a two year contract for Meli lends some credence to the suggestion that the club has opted for so-called big name players over the young talent. Although to be fair Meli only has a big name for opposition teams really given his propensity to hand them a try or two at a crucial moment. I would have much preferred to have Bradbury stick around so that he could have had a go at first team level in the coming season.

I'm disappointed that Saints are letting so many young players go. Especially in our backline. We are going to feel it this time next season.

Re: Jack Bradbury : Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:07 pm  

Bradbury wasent good enough for our first team. It was a surprise he was handed a first team contract in the first place.

He failed to impress in the u20 competition last season. Good luck to the lad but I highly doubt we'll see him in SL again.

Re: Jack Bradbury : Wed Nov 10, 2010 9:10 pm  

SaintsFan wrote:

He got a first team call up for one away match but never played.

I think the choice of a two year contract for Meli lends some credence to the suggestion that the club has opted for so-called big name players over the young talent. Although to be fair Meli only has a big name for opposition teams really given his propensity to hand them a try or two at a crucial moment. I would have much preferred to have Bradbury stick around so that he could have had a go at first team level in the coming season.

I'm disappointed that Saints are letting so many young players go. Especially in our backline. We are going to feel it this time next season.

When we go with kids though from within. The cry on these boards is WERE ARE THE BIG NAME SIGNINGS!!!

your dammed if you dont and dammed if you do. Personally think its about striking a balance.

There are only so many players you can keep, and if Saints think they have better coming through at a younger age group, there is no point hanging onto someone who would soon be outclassed by another youngster. As thats not fair on the likes of Bradbury.

Re: Jack Bradbury : Wed Nov 10, 2010 10:28 pm  

The Chair Maker wrote:

When we go with kids though from within. The cry on these boards is WERE ARE THE BIG NAME SIGNINGS!!!

your dammed if you dont and dammed if you do. Personally think its about striking a balance.

Exactly. But we're not making that balance. Francis Meli can be a half decent player, but at his age he is not going to be a dangerous player. A solid finisher who'll only let us down in major finals, but lets not confuse him with an ambitious marquee signing. Jamie Lyon/Darren Albertini he is not!

We have made two big signings this year. Shenton and Perry. Over the last 5 years we've probably let 10 world class marquee players go and signed three or four in that period.

There are a lot of squads in SL (If not all of them) with more established senior players than we have. Yet we're spending to the cap? It makes no sense at all. Renewing the contracts of Meli and Flannery prevented us having a ridiculously weak squad, but it speaks volumes about the clubs ambition if there were no possibilities for us to sign anyone better than those two.

It's like the situation at United. Former glories now looking dangerously close to being a thing of the past. Only problem is we don't have an Alex Ferguson. Jammer/Kyle are our Rooney, it'll be interesting to see how that one pans out for us.

Re: Jack Bradbury : Thu Nov 11, 2010 1:34 am  

Saddened! wrote:

Over the last 5 years we've probably let 10 world class marquee players go and signed three or four in that period.

Name them.

Re: Jack Bradbury : Thu Nov 11, 2010 9:54 am  

SaintsFan wrote:

He got a first team call up for one away match but never played.

I think the choice of a two year contract for Meli lends some credence to the suggestion that the club has opted for so-called big name players over the young talent. Although to be fair Meli only has a big name for opposition teams really given his propensity to hand them a try or two at a crucial moment. I would have much preferred to have Bradbury stick around so that he could have had a go at first team level in the coming season.

I'm disappointed that Saints are letting so many young players go. Especially in our backline. We are going to feel it this time next season.

I think Armstrong being dual registered with Leigh could really bring him on (hopefully), so that's one young centre, Foster's technically a centre by choice, Wheeler is a good choice at centre when fit and there's the young lad Tommy Makinson as well, so if Badbury was behind all of those then he wasn't going to get much of a look in at centre.
Hopefully we'll fill our centre position with one of those, or a marquee signing, but I hope Badbury does kick on at Oldham and win a SL contract. Now that the quota's tightening there should be more scope for guys like this that don't make it at their first club. Good luck to him.

Regarding the resigning of |Meli and Flanders, as I said at the time, they were pretty uninspiring news flashes, but not awful moves squad wise.
Obviously now I wish that we'd let one of them go because I'd like to sign Monaghan. If only we could of predicted he'd be available

Re: Jack Bradbury : Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:18 am  

Offside Monkey wrote:

I think Armstrong being dual registered with Leigh could really bring him on (hopefully), so that's one young centre, Foster's technically a centre by choice, Wheeler is a good choice at centre when fit and there's the young lad Tommy Makinson as well, so if Badbury was behind all of those then he wasn't going to get much of a look in at centre.
Hopefully we'll fill our centre position with one of those, or a marquee signing, but I hope Badbury does kick on at Oldham and win a SL contract. Now that the quota's tightening there should be more scope for guys like this that don't make it at their first club. Good luck to him.

Regarding the resigning of |Meli and Flanders, as I said at the time, they were pretty uninspiring news flashes, but not awful moves squad wise.
Obviously now I wish that we'd let one of them go because I'd like to sign Monaghan. If only we could of predicted he'd be available

I'd be quite happy a loosing Ned Flanders to be honest.

Re: Jack Bradbury : Thu Nov 11, 2010 12:04 pm  

Offside Monkey wrote:

I think Armstrong being dual registered with Leigh could really bring him on (hopefully), so that's one young centre, Foster's technically a centre by choice, Wheeler is a good choice at centre when fit and there's the young lad Tommy Makinson as well, so if Badbury was behind all of those then he wasn't going to get much of a look in at centre.
Hopefully we'll fill our centre position with one of those, or a marquee signing, but I hope Badbury does kick on at Oldham and win a SL contract. Now that the quota's tightening there should be more scope for guys like this that don't make it at their first club. Good luck to him.

Regarding the resigning of |Meli and Flanders, as I said at the time, they were pretty uninspiring news flashes, but not awful moves squad wise.
Obviously now I wish that we'd let one of them go because I'd like to sign Monaghan. If only we could of predicted he'd be available

But Meli doesn't count, does he? He signed before the 2007 deadline that I was reading about the other day so we could in theory have another overseas player. If we had room under the cap.