Re: Saints sign Super League hooker : Tue Jul 12, 2016 6:53 am  

Tommy Lee isn't big surprise. He's the same type of quality we have in our squad and probably a higher grade signing than peyroux, Owens and certainly a bigger signing than Tasi who imo is one of the worst signings tn8s Club has ever made.

At least Tommy Lee gets in the Salford team unlike peyroux who didn't at Warriors, Owens at widnes and Tasi at Salford.

Re: Saints sign Super League hooker : Tue Jul 12, 2016 8:12 am  

Or possibly not http://www.loverugbyleague.com/news_227 ... ation.html

Or possibly not http://www.loverugbyleague.com/news_227 ... ation.html

Re: Saints sign Super League hooker : Tue Jul 12, 2016 10:11 am  

Trainman wrote: Or possibly not http://www.loverugbyleague.com/news_227 ... ation.html If that's true, they've clearly responded to fan pressure. They clearly read the forums, which is great to see.

Trainman wrote: Or possibly not http://www.loverugbyleague.com/news_227 ... ation.html If that's true, they've clearly responded to fan pressure. They clearly read the forums, which is great to see.

Re: Saints sign Super League hooker : Tue Jul 12, 2016 10:30 am  

Saddened! wrote:

If that's true, they've clearly responded to fan pressure. They clearly read the forums, which is great to see.

I think it was your threat to hound the Saints Twitter feed that swung it.

Re: Saints sign Super League hooker : Tue Jul 12, 2016 10:34 am  

Fatbelly wrote:

I think it was your threat to hound the Saints Twitter feed that swung it.

I think so too.

Cunningham was referring to me when he made his comment about the Saints fans being sheep following the one guy who thinks negatively.

Re: Saints sign Super League hooker : Tue Jul 12, 2016 6:56 pm  

John Gilbert Reds wrote:

Tommy Lee IS a good signing for Saints, coming from someone who has seen plenty of him over the last few seasons. Here's why;

1. He's a workhorse. If it wasn't for his injuries in 2015 and 2016, he would be Super League top tackler without a doubt. At both points in the season up until his injury he was leading this.
2. He's solid and dependable. Rarely have I seen him have a "poor" game in a Salford shirt and is very consistent.

So, he's solid, dependable and consistent, except for when he's injured for half a season? Sounds like a quality signing.