Re: Well that was ugly : Mon Apr 04, 2016 12:55 pm  

On a complete side note, did anyone notice Makinson's complete indifference to LMS's celebrations when he (Makinson) scored the try in the corner against Widnes? It was either a 'I'm too cool to celebrate' or a 'I can't be doing with you mate' demeanour.

They still don't all look like they're in it together IMO.

Re: Well that was ugly : Mon Apr 04, 2016 6:36 pm  

Twentyman wrote:

On a complete side note, did anyone notice Makinson's complete indifference to LMS's celebrations when he (Makinson) scored the try in the corner against Widnes? It was either a 'I'm too cool to celebrate' or a 'I can't be doing with you mate' demeanour.

They still don't all look like they're in it together IMO.

Let's say Tommy not over the moon with things at min.

Re: Well that was ugly : Mon Apr 04, 2016 11:43 pm  

St pete wrote:

Let's say Tommy not over the moon with things at min.

I thought so, his body language showed that. It was almost a protest try.

Re: Well that was ugly : Tue Apr 05, 2016 8:08 am  

St pete wrote:

Let's say Tommy not over the moon with things at min.

No outside back with any meaningful regard for his career would want to play under kc. If I was any of swift/tommy/Percy I'd be looking elsewhere to showcase my ability rather than being wasted at Saints.

Re: Well that was ugly : Tue Apr 05, 2016 9:00 am  

FearTheVee wrote:

No outside back with any meaningful regard for his career would want to play under kc. If I was any of swift/tommy/Percy I'd be looking elsewhere to showcase my ability rather than being wasted at Saints.

Walmsley and Sav don't look too happy either.

Re: Well that was ugly : Tue Apr 05, 2016 9:09 am  

FearTheVee wrote:

No outside back with any meaningful regard for his career would want to play under kc. If I was any of swift/tommy/Percy I'd be looking elsewhere to showcase my ability rather than being wasted at Saints.

A Pack grinding forward + a mediocre scrum half ( don't tackle me) with a reasonable kicking game. Who needs outside backs. Kc's philosophy?.

Re: Well that was ugly : Wed Apr 06, 2016 11:36 am  

Wouldn't surprise me to see Walmsley and Savelio in the NRL next season. Think the only thing holding Percival back is that he appears to be very injury prone (unique for us, I know...).

Re: Well that was ugly : Wed Apr 06, 2016 1:59 pm  

St pete wrote:

Let's say Tommy not over the moon with things at min.

On field or off?

Re: Well that was ugly : Wed Apr 06, 2016 3:55 pm  

Billinge_Lump wrote:

On field or off?

On field and imagine off as a result in that