Re: Team for Friday : Fri Sep 20, 2013 10:15 am  

I've not too confident about this one. In terms of players I suppose we could run Leeds close and even possibly beat them if they weren't on top form.

But it's the lack of a leader in Saints team that worries me, when it starts to go against us in the big games there really isn't anyone stepping up. LMS hints at it from time to time, but I'd be a lot more confident with a proper captain in there.

Re: Team for Friday : Fri Sep 20, 2013 10:49 am  

Saddened! wrote:

I've not too confident about this one. In terms of players I suppose we could run Leeds close and even possibly beat them if they weren't on top form.

But it's the lack of a leader in Saints team that worries me, when it starts to go against us in the big games there really isn't anyone stepping up. LMS hints at it from time to time, but I'd be a lot more confident with a proper captain in there.

A sensible post , are you ill?
Roby leads by example, dragging the team with him, but the lack of a kicking half will probably cost us. As for Leeds being in form, they're not really!

Re: Team for Friday : Fri Sep 20, 2013 11:10 am  

Hey if we are competitive in an intense match, that will be a start. No one wants to be on the end of a HULLING.

Re: Team for Friday : Fri Sep 20, 2013 12:43 pm  

bewareshadows wrote:

Hey if we are competitive in an intense match, that will be a start. No one wants to be on the end of a HULLING.

Is that worse than a fisting? How many fists make a hull?