Re: What next for Scott Moore : Thu Sep 20, 2012 8:31 am
Is everyone hypnotized? Seriously I think the club have convinced the lot of you that turning up to training an hour early and doing lots of community is more important that actually being able to play Rugby. Scott is an undoubted talent and is easily Super League quality. So he turned out to be a rebel off the field, the club has had him under contract since his early teens, so who is to blame then? If what a player does off the field is more important than what he does on then maybe the club should have been life coaching rather than shipping him off to clubs with drinking cultures like Castleford.
I don't have an issue with Scott off the field, I have an issue with his defence (something else that the club could have helped him with). But where would we be now if players like Goulding, Gleeson and Long had not been given a chance at the club because they didn't live like nuns off it.