SaintsFan wrote:
Yeah, sure, that's why we were walloping them for the first 60 minutes.
Walloping is an exaggeration and you know it. We also shouldn't forget that they actually were walloping you for the last 20.
Cats were the deserved winners and claiming that because Pryce played the ball after he'd been tackled (which he obviously did) you should be declared the victors (whether morally or not) is madness.
They say that refereeing mistakes even themselves out over the season. Well considering Saints nicked, at least 10 maybe 14 or 16, points off cats (1 try for saints and 2 disallowed for cats), the 6 they scored off the Pryce mistake isn't really worth quibbling over.
Could have and should have been much worse. However, I will agree with you that it wasn't Royce's fault.