Re: Paul Clough & Sia Soliola : Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:07 am  

FearTheVee wrote:

Could you give me an example of how this works? How was Tom Armstrong going to come into the game on Sunday and make an impact?

Sadly in Tom's case I don't think he could. I was trying to say if we had a back who could make an impact on the game I'd have no objection to having them on the bench , like Pryce or Eastmond

Re: Paul Clough & Sia Soliola : Tue Sep 20, 2011 3:21 pm  

No1 Saint wrote:

Sadly in Tom's case I don't think he could.

Exactly. Absolute pointless waste of time having him there rather than another forward.

No1 Saint wrote:

I was trying to say if we had a back who could make an impact on the game I'd have no objection to having them on the bench , like Pryce or Eastmond

But even then you are going to break up your halves or just shove a player on the wing. It's so disruptive.

Makes no sense to me. 4 forwards on the bench please Royce.

Re: Paul Clough & Sia Soliola : Tue Sep 20, 2011 7:37 pm  

FearTheVee wrote:

Exactly. Absolute pointless waste of time having him there rather than another forward.

But even then you are going to break up your halves or just shove a player on the wing. It's so disruptive.

Makes no sense to me. 4 forwards on the bench please Royce.

It seems we are 99.9% agreed on here that Royce should use 17 instead of having a player sat on bench for 80 mins while some are out on their feet.

Re: Paul Clough & Sia Soliola : Tue Sep 20, 2011 8:08 pm  

St pete wrote:

I've got a feeling Royce will go with flannery and leave Dixon out of semi

No arguement there if thats the case.

I'm one of the few people who remain to be 100% convinced about cloughie. The words ordinary shout out at me when I watch him. I am perhaps being a tad unfair as he has not long been back.