Re: Ashurst : Tue Aug 23, 2011 3:09 pm  

Ashurst - Needs work, but will be a good(ish) player imo.
Has a good athletic frame that will lend its self to adding wood.

I thought he looked really good at the end of last season before he picked up an injury. He hasn't maganed to regain that form, but I think he's got a bit in him.

Re: Ashurst : Tue Aug 23, 2011 3:15 pm  

Offside Monkey wrote:

Ashurst - Needs work, but will be a good(ish) player imo.
Has a good athletic frame that will lend its self to adding wood.

I thought he looked really good at the end of last season before he picked up an injury. He hasn't maganed to regain that form, but I think he's got a bit in him.

He looks to be an intelligent player to me, runs good lines, positions himself well, he just doesn't have the bulk to make half breaks full breaks. If/when he adds that he'll be a good player with the added experience.

Re: Ashurst : Wed Aug 24, 2011 7:45 am  

Someone mentioned Forster at 18th man. He seems to be very affective for the underwhatevers since his return from injury, I'm suprised we haven't sen him yet, especially given how we've suffered at prop.

Re: Ashurst : Wed Aug 24, 2011 6:44 pm  

We should have kept Johnson, not Emmit.

Re: Ashurst : Thu Aug 25, 2011 12:37 am  

The reality is that IF Perry had of been fit Emmit would of got very little game time and an international front rower is allways going to get in ahead of a youngster.