bren2k wrote:
Are you suggesting that 'Ted' is such a perfectly formed piece of comedy that only those people totally devoid of a sense of humour would fail to find it funny?
No-one's saying that. But let's see what you said about it: "puerile, pointless, devoid of humour and lacking any discernible plot or storyline".
"Puerile" - many, many silly comedies are. "Pointless" - arguably, but then again the same could be said of many films. "Devoid of humour" - incorrect. Whether you like it or not, as an out & out comedy it received mostly positive reviews, was huge at the box office and has achieved good ratings on sites such as IMDB, Metacritic & Rotten Tomatoes. "Lacking any discernible plot or storyline" - come on, the plot was extremely simple to discern and understand. A pretty standard formula: the rise & fall & rise again of friendship and a love interest. DId you really find it hard to understand?
Personally, I thought the unsubtle crudeness of the humour became tiresome (probably why the American audience loved it), the film became a bit of a one-trick pony, but overall thought it was ok with a few decent laughs. I'd give it 3/5 simply because it does what it says on the tin.