: Tue Mar 24, 2009 1:56 pm  

rhinoms wrote:

:lol:
What about KC's head slam on burgess???
Or the numerous late hit's that hooper got away with???
How many times has pryce got away cheap shot's???
Stone's and glass house's come's to mind!!

Just glasses in Pryce's case.

: Tue Mar 24, 2009 1:59 pm  

eddiewaringsflatcap wrote:

The argument of Bailey's discipline was proved errant by the fact that Wigan fans used to argue the same thing with Terry Newton.

What on earth has Terry Newton, or Wigan fans' views on his discipline, got to do with Bailey?

: Tue Mar 24, 2009 2:11 pm  

G1 wrote:

Another racist from St Helens visits our boards.

Welcome racist.

Care to back your claim up in court?

: Tue Mar 24, 2009 2:12 pm  

RB wrote:

Care to back your claim up in court?

Who rattled your cage?

: Tue Mar 24, 2009 2:13 pm  

rhinoms wrote:

:lol:
What about KC's head slam on burgess???

Didn't saints get penalised?

Or the numerous late hit's that hooper got away with???

Blown way out of proportion.

How many times has pryce got away cheap shot's???

He never gets away with anything. He got a three match ban for caressing an old friend once.

: Tue Mar 24, 2009 2:22 pm  

Offside Monkey wrote:

Didn't saints get penalised?
Blown way out of proportion.
He never gets away with anything.
He got a three match ban for caressing an old friend once.

Should of got at least 1 match for the grapple then the head slam that followed.
Hooper's late hit's could never be blown out of proportion just ask brandon costin and terry newton who both injured player's with late hit's but because no-one was seriousley injured when hooper did it he got away with it which imo doesn't make it right.
As for pryce what happened when he did it again??
Answer the rfl bottled it and blamed some obscure camera angle for him not getting banned.
P.s I agree the rfl disciplinary system is a joke but you saying "we got away with one for once" is just as big a joke!!

: Tue Mar 24, 2009 2:29 pm  

G1 wrote:

Another racist from St Helens visits our boards.

Welcome racist.

I don't recall any mention of racism

Leeds are to good of a team to have to resort to a 'player' of the likes of Bailey.
He does not do the profile of Rugby League any good at all.

: Tue Mar 24, 2009 2:29 pm  

The racist comments are a bit OTT IMO.

: Tue Mar 24, 2009 2:33 pm  

Saint Ermintrude wrote:

I don't recall any mention of racism

Leeds are to good of a team to have to resort to a 'player' of the likes of Bailey.
He does not do the profile of Rugby League any good at all.

And what good does 2 player's betting on their own team to lose do for the image of our great game????

: Tue Mar 24, 2009 2:38 pm  

Saint Ermintrude wrote:

I don't recall any mention of racism

Leeds are to good of a team to have to resort to a 'player' of the likes of Bailey.
He does not do the profile of Rugby League any good at all.

In what way?