: Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:58 am  

expatrhino wrote: I love how Saddened can come on here and criticize Bailey for being cowardly , dirty and how he shouldn't be in our team. Then he starts a thread on his site, where he should probably stay with his inane drivel. About how he misses a cheap shot merchant in Hooper. http://forums.rlfans.com//viewtopic.php?t=401219 I think G1 might be right in his opinion that their maybe a reason why he is overly critical of Bailey. when he obviously likes a player who is late tackling cheap shot merchant imo. I wonder what the difference is? I've not said Bailey is a dirty player or cowardly, I've just questioned the Leeds fans perception of him being a good player. The only things I've questioned are his abilities and the coaching staff's perception of his temperament. Not his yellowness, or blackness for that matter. Hooper was another player adored by his own fans who courted controversy but barely ever stepped out of line in the light of the law.

expatrhino wrote: I love how Saddened can come on here and criticize Bailey for being cowardly , dirty and how he shouldn't be in our team. Then he starts a thread on his site, where he should probably stay with his inane drivel. About how he misses a cheap shot merchant in Hooper. http://forums.rlfans.com//viewtopic.php?t=401219 I think G1 might be right in his opinion that their maybe a reason why he is overly critical of Bailey. when he obviously likes a player who is late tackling cheap shot merchant imo. I wonder what the difference is? I've not said Bailey is a dirty player or cowardly, I've just questioned the Leeds fans perception of him being a good player. The only things I've questioned are his abilities and the coaching staff's perception of his temperament. Not his yellowness, or blackness for that matter. Hooper was another player adored by his own fans who courted controversy but barely ever stepped out of line in the light of the law.

: Tue Mar 24, 2009 1:23 am  

Saddened! wrote:

I've not said Bailey is a dirty player or cowardly, I've just questioned the Leeds fans perception of him being a good player. The only things I've questioned are his abilities and the coaching staff's perception of his temperament. Not his yellowness, or blackness for that matter.

Hooper was another player adored by his own fans who courted controversy but barely ever stepped out of line in the light of the law.

Saddened! wrote:

But we all know who Ryan Bailey is. He isn't someone who could stand toe to toe with James Graham (In rugby terms( and come out alive. He wasn't anywhere near as good as the Leeds fans make out. He was massively unpopular before the game, yet one tackle later he's the new Kevin Ward. Bailey is a very average player, his stats don't lie.

You go on about Bailey doing a great job in winding the opposition up, but how many penalties did he attract? Did he even touch the ball following the incident, bar the laughable crab movement?

Sorry must of thought that was a comment about cowardice!

Saddened! wrote:

Nonsense, they took him off because they didn't trust him. And how can you suggest Graham was a liability when he came back on? We won the game when he did, there is a link between the two.

and this was comment on him giving away penalties, i.e dirty.

: Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:30 am  

expatrhino wrote: I love how Saddened can come on here and criticize Bailey for being cowardly , dirty and how he shouldn't be in our team. Then he starts a thread on his site, where he should probably stay with his inane drivel. About how he misses a cheap shot merchant in Hooper. http://forums.rlfans.com//viewtopic.php?t=401219 I think G1 might be right in his opinion that their maybe a reason why he is overly critical of Bailey. when he obviously likes a player who is late tackling cheap shot merchant imo. I wonder what the difference is? not to mention how quickly you'd be banned from the saints site..

expatrhino wrote: I love how Saddened can come on here and criticize Bailey for being cowardly , dirty and how he shouldn't be in our team. Then he starts a thread on his site, where he should probably stay with his inane drivel. About how he misses a cheap shot merchant in Hooper. http://forums.rlfans.com//viewtopic.php?t=401219 I think G1 might be right in his opinion that their maybe a reason why he is overly critical of Bailey. when he obviously likes a player who is late tackling cheap shot merchant imo. I wonder what the difference is? not to mention how quickly you'd be banned from the saints site..

: Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:47 am  

Saddened! wrote:

:lol: I suppose I'm a homophobe too, for arguing with you?

: Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:34 am  

Saddened! wrote:

:lol: I suppose I'm a homophobe too, for arguing with you?

No, you're a homophobe because your implication was I am a homosexual and this was used in a derogatory manner as if being homosexual was something I ought to be embarrassed about, if indeed I were.

So, to clarify, you're clearly a homophobe and you're a racist because its' the only way to judge your completely irrational view of Bailey.

: Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:35 am  

RB wrote:

:lol:

You're a homophobe because yuo found it funny.

: Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:42 am  

G1 wrote:

No, you're a homophobe because your implication was I am a homosexual and this was used in a derogatory manner as if being homosexual was something I ought to be embarrassed about, if indeed I were.

I was not. You assume too much.

My opinion that Bailey is an average player is hardly irrational either.

: Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:51 am  

Saddened! wrote:

I was not. You assume too much.

I assume nothing. Your post is clear. It couldn't be clearer. There's even a laughter emoticon.

Homophobe.

My opinion that Bailey is an average player is hardly irrational either.

Judgeing his abilities I have no issue with. Its' the rabid posts describing him as "dirty" "thug" and "cheap shot merchant" etc that are impossible to explain other than being racially motivated, whether subconsciously or not.

: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:16 am  

G1 wrote:

I assume nothing. Your post is clear. It couldn't be clearer. There's even a laughter emoticon.

Homophobe.

Judgeing his abilities I have no issue with. Its' the rabid posts describing him as "dirty" "thug" and "cheap shot merchant" etc that are impossible to explain other than being racially motivated, whether subconsciously or not.

The laughing emoticon is prior to the supposidly homophobic slur, so therefore, not related to it.

You won't find any posts of mine featuring the words dirty, thug or cheap shot merchant either, although I'm sure you'll attempt to trawl up some inference to said phrases.

: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:17 am  

Saddened! wrote:

The laughing emoticon is prior to the supposidly homophobic slur, so therefore, not related to it.

You won't find any posts of mine featuring the words dirty, thug or cheap shot merchant either, although I'm sure you'll attempt to trawl up some inference to said phrases.

I'll take your 2nd paragrah at face value. You're not a racist but clearly you're a homophobe.