: Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:31 pm  

Damo-Leeds wrote:

What’s this impressive tackle on Bailey again?

James Grahams tackles on Bailey where just above average for me. Bailey no doubt did the tackle of the game.

Bailey 1 Graham 0

The BEST post you have ever put on here and contender for best of 2009

: Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:53 pm  

Damo-Leeds wrote:

What’s this impressive tackle on Bailey again?

James Grahams tackles on Bailey where just above average for me. Bailey no doubt did the tackle of the game.

Bailey 1 Graham 0

Fantastic effort Damo

What can't speak, can't lie

At least we now know who the 3rd man in, cheap shot merchant is, as if we didn't anyhow!

Have you posted this on the Saints forum?

: Sun Mar 22, 2009 8:25 pm  

Not sure this has been mentioned


How many times has Ryan Bailey been either sin binned or red carded during his first team days?



very intresting

: Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:11 pm  

The Biffs Back wrote:

Have you posted this on the Saints forum?

I shouldn’t really put this in a time like this. But some of the saints fans on that board are as deluded as some are on here. Its just petty playground stuff that most of us can’t break away from. Times like this though we’ll unite respective of our views. It’s a shame that it can’t be like this all of the time as we’ll progress more in 1 year than we have in 100 years.

: Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:07 pm  

Above & Beyond wrote:

Not sure this has been mentioned


How many times has Ryan Bailey been either sin binned or red carded during his first team days?



very intresting

May be wrong, but read on a thread over last few days that his alleged disgusting cowardly bully boy antics have resulted in a career total of

1 YELLOW CARD

Keep up the good, fair, legal work Ryan.

: Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:12 pm  

Longun wrote:

May be wrong, but read on a thread over last few days that his alleged disgusting cowardly bully boy antics have resulted in a career total of

1 YELLOW CARD

Keep up the good, fair, legal work Ryan.

according to the stats page on here you may be

but its not far out

: Mon Mar 23, 2009 2:17 pm  

Nothing illegal. So why was a penalty awarded to St Helens by Mr Phil 'Homer' Bentham then? Gilmour facial on Smith So why was a penalty awarded to St Helens by Mr Phil 'Homer' Bentham then?

Nothing illegal. So why was a penalty awarded to St Helens by Mr Phil 'Homer' Bentham then? Gilmour facial on Smith So why was a penalty awarded to St Helens by Mr Phil 'Homer' Bentham then?

: Mon Mar 23, 2009 2:19 pm  

tvoc wrote: Nothing illegal. So why was a penalty awarded by Mr Phil 'Homer' Bentham then? bentham is a homer.watch any game in which he refs.

tvoc wrote: Nothing illegal. So why was a penalty awarded by Mr Phil 'Homer' Bentham then? bentham is a homer.watch any game in which he refs.

: Mon Mar 23, 2009 2:27 pm  

tvoc wrote: Nothing illegal. So why was a penalty awarded to St Helens by Mr Phil 'Homer' Bentham then? Gilmour facial on Smith So why was a penalty awarded to St Helens by Mr Phil 'Homer' Bentham then? I suppose you might have the stats for Mr Benthams matches for this season so far and last season for penalties home sides and away sides? Might be interesting. Though I suspect the majority of matches the home side wins the penalty count.

tvoc wrote: Nothing illegal. So why was a penalty awarded to St Helens by Mr Phil 'Homer' Bentham then? Gilmour facial on Smith So why was a penalty awarded to St Helens by Mr Phil 'Homer' Bentham then? I suppose you might have the stats for Mr Benthams matches for this season so far and last season for penalties home sides and away sides? Might be interesting. Though I suspect the majority of matches the home side wins the penalty count.

: Mon Mar 23, 2009 2:30 pm  

tvoc wrote: Nothing illegal. So why was a penalty awarded to St Helens by Mr Phil 'Homer' Bentham then? Gilmour facial on Smith So why was a penalty awarded to St Helens by Mr Phil 'Homer' Bentham then? I was castigated on here a week or so ago for suggesting that Leeds got the benefit of a few calls v Wigan. The same thing happened to you on Friday. Gilmour pulls Smiths hair, that's what started that fight and there was nothing wrong with either of Baileys challenges. Whether we like it or not the home side almost always get the advantage of the close calls. (Unless your a Catalan side v Bulls)

tvoc wrote: Nothing illegal. So why was a penalty awarded to St Helens by Mr Phil 'Homer' Bentham then? Gilmour facial on Smith So why was a penalty awarded to St Helens by Mr Phil 'Homer' Bentham then? I was castigated on here a week or so ago for suggesting that Leeds got the benefit of a few calls v Wigan. The same thing happened to you on Friday. Gilmour pulls Smiths hair, that's what started that fight and there was nothing wrong with either of Baileys challenges. Whether we like it or not the home side almost always get the advantage of the close calls. (Unless your a Catalan side v Bulls)