: Mon Sep 28, 2009 4:01 pm  

LS13 wrote:

I was replying to a question posted by Gateaux .. Here is her question ...



Here it the reply ...



What is so difficult to understand about that for a person as highly educated as yourself ?

So where is the proof then?

: Mon Sep 28, 2009 4:03 pm  

You need proof that people do not re-offend after they have been executed ?

: Mon Sep 28, 2009 4:05 pm  

LS13 wrote:

You need proof that people do not re-offend after they have been executed ?

Reincarnation

: Mon Sep 28, 2009 4:06 pm  

Fook me this has turned up a bit since last night!...

: Mon Sep 28, 2009 4:07 pm  

LS13 wrote:

You need proof that people do not re-offend after they have been executed ?

No. I need proof that the convictions are 100% accurate and that crime figures have fallen in states where the death penalty is.

Then I want a valid argument of why vigilanteism is the way to go (in 2000 words).

: Mon Sep 28, 2009 4:07 pm  

There's always one ain't there .
Damo.. You win the prize today

: Mon Sep 28, 2009 4:09 pm  

Truly got the obsession bug .

Where did I say that ?

: Mon Sep 28, 2009 4:11 pm  

The Joker® wrote:

Fook me this has turned up a bit since last night!...

Hasnt it just

: Mon Sep 28, 2009 4:11 pm  

LS13 wrote:

Truly got the obsession bug .

Where did I say that ?

Say what?

: Mon Sep 28, 2009 4:15 pm  

LS13 wrote:

HH.. You mentioned that you were a couple and she was almost of age. That is different . It is still wrong though , and illegal .That would just deserve you getting a hiding from her dad if the family decided that BOTH your actions didn't warrant them reporting you to the relevant authorities

Hang on, she was 16 (a week off 17 actually) which is legal is it not? Also I had known her dad since I was about 14 myself and we are very good friends now.

My point was if the same age gap applied to 2 people 1 year younger would the older person deserve to get ambushed and beaten for it?

AFWIW I did nothing wrong