: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:40 pm  

LS13 wrote:

Anyone who has the opinion that they shoulnd't die is condoning it . And before you start changing tact and applying it to burglars/robbers/shoplifters/drunk drivers etc etc etc .. I specifically mean it should only be applied to paedophiles .

It is condoning it because they are allowed out to re-offend . Kill them and they will not re-offend .

I will be collecting my two youngest kids ( ages 3 and 5 ) from school at 3:15pm . Do you want me to do a quick survey of a few parents to see if they think paedophiles should die . Would you be surprised if the majority say yes ?

I don't believe in the death penalty. Nor do I believe in mob rule.

If your idea of debating this issue is to state that I now condone Paedophillia because I disagree with your point of view then there's little point discussing it further as you're clearly not very bright.

: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:44 pm  

LS13 wrote:

Anyone who has the opinion that they shoulnd't die is condoning it ...

Why?

LS13 wrote:

And before you start changing tact and applying it to burglars/robbers/shoplifters/drunk drivers etc etc etc .. I specifically mean it should only be applied to paedophiles ..

Why?

LS13 wrote:

It is condoning it because they are allowed out to re-offend . Kill them and they will not re-offend .

So you have murderous tendencies then?

LS13 wrote:

I will be collecting my two youngest kids ( ages 3 and 5 ) from school at 3:15pm . Do you want me to do a quick survey of a few parents to see if they think paedophiles should die . Would you be surprised if the majority say yes ?

Feel free. They'll probably think you're a crank mind.

If a child killer/abuser was murdered in jail I'd shrug my shoulders and say 'never mind'. It's still wrong though.

: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:47 pm  

So how should they should be dealt with ? I back the death penalty for certain offences . The punishment should be as severe as the crime committed. I would aslo back burglary victims been allowed to visit the home of the offender and helping themselves to the contents of their house .

Custodial sentence and rehabilitation ? That has been proven not to be a major deterrent . The number of re-offenders you read about backs that fact . And before you ask me to back that argument up there is no way I am putting that in a search on my computer .

: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:48 pm  

What do people think of the theory that people are born paedophiles, and can't help their behaviour?

Wouldn't attacking them be the equivalent of attacking a person with cerebral palsey for using a wheelchair?

: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:53 pm  

If a child killer/abuser was murdered in jail I'd shrug my shoulders and say 'never mind'.

At last.. A sensible reply and something we can agree on .

: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:55 pm  

LS13 wrote:

The punishment should be as severe as the crime committed.

Killing a paedophile is more severe than the crime though isn't it.

LS13 wrote:

And before you ask me to back that argument up there is no way I am putting that in a search on my computer .

Now that's ridiculous.

: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:56 pm  

LS13 wrote:

At last.. A sensible reply and something we can agree on .

There have been plenty of sensible replies, just not from you.

You may agree with the sentiment of my post but it's still wrong.

: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:56 pm  

LS13 wrote:

Anyone who has the opinion that they shoulnd't die is condoning it . And before you start changing tact and applying it to burglars/robbers/shoplifters/drunk drivers etc etc etc .. I specifically mean it should only be applied to paedophiles .

It is condoning it because they are allowed out to re-offend . Kill them and they will not re-offend .

I will be collecting my two youngest kids ( ages 3 and 5 ) from school at 3:15pm . Do you want me to do a quick survey of a few parents to see if they think paedophiles should die . Would you be surprised if the majority say yes ?

what makes paedophiles worse though than a range of other crimes though? those you have selected are comparatively minor crimes in most cases (although can still take lives/ruin lives) but what about others guilty of murder or rape or anything else along those lines? Why only paedophiles?

Just because people don't think people should be able to take the law into there own hands, or they don't believe the death penalty should be used doesn't mean they are in any way condoning the actions.

Is there any proof that in places where the death penalty exists the number of people committing the offences is any less? (I am sure I read once that the figures were similar but not 100% sure)

: Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:00 pm  

LS13 wrote:

Anyone who has the opinion that they shoulnd't die is condoning it . And before you start changing tact and applying it to burglars/robbers/shoplifters/drunk drivers etc etc etc .. I specifically mean it should only be applied to paedophiles .

It is condoning it because they are allowed out to re-offend . Kill them and they will not re-offend .

I will be collecting my two youngest kids ( ages 3 and 5 ) from school at 3:15pm . Do you want me to do a quick survey of a few parents to see if they think paedophiles should die . Would you be surprised if the majority say yes ?

This guy does condone it, however:

: Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:01 pm  

Because child abuse is in my opinion the worst crime imaginable .

There is proof that in places where the death penalty exists the number of people re-offending after servibg their 'sentence' is a big fat zero .