Re: SL GF | St Helens (Old Trafford) : Thu Sep 22, 2022 3:16 pm
christopher wrote:
But again the appeal judiciary stated that it was only because catkin reacted and changed his position that the arm didn't go out of 'normal range'.
You put your arm where Atkins was and then think that there is someone twisting it - normal range of motion or not it could injure you.
It was a clear bit of fowl play that nobody seem to question when given a ban. well apart from Saints that is. The way it has subsequently been handled by the RFL is an absolute farce. For example there's no actual ruling, what happened did it get downgraded to a grade A, did the whole thing get thrown out because the appeal was flawed, I don't know why Saints fans are getting al uppity people are having a go at the RFL not Saints.
You put your arm where Atkins was and then think that there is someone twisting it - normal range of motion or not it could injure you.
It was a clear bit of fowl play that nobody seem to question when given a ban. well apart from Saints that is. The way it has subsequently been handled by the RFL is an absolute farce. For example there's no actual ruling, what happened did it get downgraded to a grade A, did the whole thing get thrown out because the appeal was flawed, I don't know why Saints fans are getting al uppity people are having a go at the RFL not Saints.
It was a chicken wing tackle. Naturally.