Re: From a neutrals point of view... : Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:38 pm  

FearTheVee wrote:

Was agreeing with you, in a confusing kind of way!

Im still confused

: Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:39 pm  

I don't feel Leeds were robbed tonight but I feel the bulls didn't deserve the win really.
Leeds were flat tonight and just had a very unfortunate run of luck. On any other night, Burrow would have got to the kick through and some of the other calls would have gone your way.
You might have been a little sharper and got to some of the balls better for the tries to be no brainers.
You'll bounce back though.

: Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:40 pm  

Dicko_09 wrote:

Well m8 according to stevo its ok, however if in the build up there was any doubt of it he should not have awarded thee try as he did with ours through doubt

Never listen to stevo EVER!

: Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:40 pm  

Blobbynator wrote:

I can't believe some people are claiming it went backwards. The ball clearly went forward. Watch the trajectory of the ball, it clearly went forward.

a scouser who thinks a pass went forward - shock

Re: From a neutrals point of view... : Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:46 pm  

Dave Lister wrote:

It was recieved by a Leeds player like a pass would have been. Smith could have pulled it up for a forward pass, Alibert could not.

Can you have an unintentional forward pass or is it an accidental knock on.

Either way, no try.

Re: From a neutrals point of view... : Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:48 pm  

King Monkey wrote:

Can you have an unintentional forward pass or is it an accidental knock on.

Either way, no try.

Fact is the video referee can't disallow it for an unintentional forward pass. Smith could have, Alibert could not.

: Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:49 pm  

Oh and KM, I understand your determination to rile people on here but stupidity is poor trolling IMO.

Re: From a neutrals point of view... : Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:49 pm  

Dave Lister wrote:

Fact is the video referee can't disallow it for an unintentional forward pass. Smith could have, Alibert could not.

An unintentional forward pass is a knock on.

Leeds lost fairly, get over it.

: Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:50 pm  

Dave Lister wrote:

Oh and KM, I understand your determination to rile people on here but stupidity is poor trolling IMO.

Stupidity because I understand the rules of the game and you dont?

Re: From a neutrals point of view... : Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:50 pm  

Dave Lister wrote:

Fact is the video referee can't disallow it for an unintentional forward pass. Smith could have, Alibert could not.

Why do you keep going on about a forward pass when it was a knock on?