Gotcha wrote:
Well I thank you for your comment and agreement, but your last bit is exactly where this board struggles. People make assumptions and because of it fail to read posts fully.
My comment on the club was that this would be the fourth deal in the last year that the club have told the players it is sorted, but have failed to see the deal through with the players club. My point was entirely to do with proclaiming yourself as a club loyal and look after players, which Leeds have been excellent at. Now had those "deals" come from one source of information, then hell I would be agreeing totally with you, but that is not the case, and I have repeated that a fair few times over. Gossip is third hand, and usually from fellow spectators, it is not from the player concerned mouth.
You still fail to see or acknowledge that you have been critical and disrespectful to the Leeds club and management which was a point that I posted before which you chose to ignore. In it I pointed out that you specifically accused the club of being unprofessional. You also used emotive phrases which implied fault and bad faith on the part of the club eg "pull out" "proclaims to look after players", "false promises" , "Leeds telling players something that was not the case" and you even had the arrogance to justify your criticism by saying you were "making a moral point"
Therefore I have read your posts carefully and the above comments are not an assumption but black and white evidence that you were being critical of the club. You did not make clear you were passing on a one sided version of events that could be open to question. Indeed sound judgement would have led you to question what you had been told before posting. Had you done this you would have seen that Leeds had offered terms that were subject to contract.
You also stated that "I only know the Leeds position" when you couldn't have done as you did not speak to the Leeds negotiators first hand.
