Arthur saying how disappointed he is with the last 20 and rightly so.
Also getting a dig in on Connor saying something about the pretty stuff but he doesn`t want pretty players he wants graft which I think is a bit unfair on Connor who was clearly MoM and creates something out of nothing.
Prefer him in the halves alongside Croft with Miller at FB and Handley on the wing.
Gannon to LF and well played Bentley and Sinfield who I thought did well against a poor Castleford.
Arthur saying how disappointed he is with the last 20 and rightly so.
Also getting a dig in on Connor saying something about the pretty stuff but he doesn`t want pretty players he wants graft which I think is a bit unfair on Connor who was clearly MoM and creates something out of nothing.
Prefer him in the halves alongside Croft with Miller at FB and Handley on the wing.
Gannon to LF and well played Bentley and Sinfield who I thought did well against a poor Castleford.
You can see what the plan was. Handley at centre with a big, powerful winger outside him like Sivo or Hall as a foil to give him more space for his footwork and speed. A big shame about Sivo as it could have been very effective.
Still think Handley would be better on the wing though. And that Lumb is doing a great job.
You can see what the plan was. Handley at centre with a big, powerful winger outside him like Sivo or Hall as a foil to give him more space for his footwork and speed. A big shame about Sivo as it could have been very effective.
Still think Handley would be better on the wing though. And that Lumb is doing a great job.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.