No you haven't.



Week 1: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=442354&start=30







And in any other week the term 'champs' would be unambiguous but last week's WCC was between two reigning Champs so I'm sure you see my point. I'm not Derren Brown.



I scored your prediction as backing Leeds anyway so don't fret and you've not tried to pull a fast one after the event so everyone's happy.

No you haven't.



Week 1: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=442354&start=30







And in any other week the term 'champs' would be unambiguous but last week's WCC was between two reigning Champs so I'm sure you see my point. I'm not Derren Brown.



I scored your prediction as backing Leeds anyway so don't fret and you've not tried to pull a fast one after the event so everyone's happy.

I haven't been asked to offer such a service, I don't think that it is neccessary and I wouldn't want to anyway.



I also feel that the current arrangement where posters are encouraged to check their own totals and a weekly summary of discrepancies published here viewtopic.php?f=17&t=446160&start=90 should be sufficient to ensure the competition's integrity.



I think the competition's administrator is actually capable of running the event to everyone's satisfaction. It's been a difficult start but things have improved and I trust will continue to do so until I can quickly sign off each week's results without any issues.



Job done.

I haven't been asked to offer such a service, I don't think that it is neccessary and I wouldn't want to anyway.



I also feel that the current arrangement where posters are encouraged to check their own totals and a weekly summary of discrepancies published here viewtopic.php?f=17&t=446160&start=90 should be sufficient to ensure the competition's integrity.



I think the competition's administrator is actually capable of running the event to everyone's satisfaction. It's been a difficult start but things have improved and I trust will continue to do so until I can quickly sign off each week's results without any issues.



Job done.