Re: Linesman : Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:07 pm  

From what I saw Senior's first try was held up and Hall’s was double movement but hey, swings and roundabouts.

Re: Linesman : Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:11 pm  

LS16_Rhino wrote:

From what I saw Senior's first try was held up and Hall’s was double movement but hey, swings and roundabouts.

Unless you were one of the Hull defenders I'd suggest that Bentham had an infinitely better view than you & he saw nothing wrong with it.

Re: Linesman : Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:13 pm  

rhinogonemad wrote:

I think you should get back in your can lawrie, I was only commenting on two which I was in position to comment on if thats ok? just as you have !!

As I said Hull were well flattered by the 30 points scored, me thinks you will have to improve close to 200% for neext week or your booties will be handed to you again, you will need dads army to compete

Well Done. You are buffoon of the week.

Re: Linesman : Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:16 pm  

the hull second try was a mile forward with both ref and touch judge in line to call but didn't.
the rest i couldn't tell

Re: Linesman : Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:19 pm  

LS16_Rhino wrote:

From what I saw Senior's first try was held up and Hall’s was double movement but hey, swings and roundabouts.

hall did a great impression of a crawling commando to get over the try line

would say a triple movement!

Re: Linesman : Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:22 pm  

Blue 'n Amber wrote:

Well Done. You are buffoon of the week.

why am I bafoon of the week then

Re: Linesman : Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:23 pm  

rhinogonemad wrote:

why am I bafoon of the week then

...BnA takes out his frustrations of the week on this board, just leave him to it

Re: Linesman : Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:25 pm  

Old Feller wrote:

Unless you were one of the Hull defenders I'd suggest that Bentham had an infinitely better view than you & he saw nothing wrong with it.

For Senior’s first try Bentham consulted with both the touchie and the in-goal official before awarding the score suggesting he didn’t have that clear view of the event.

From where I was on the Western Terrace I wasn’t actually that much further away from the touchdown than Benthan so stating that he had an “infinitely better view than you” is incorrect.

Now stop being a smart arse and accept that there may be some contention with at least Senior’s try.

Are you still pissed at me for saying that cricket is crap?

Re: Linesman : Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:27 pm  

LS16_Rhino wrote:

For Senior’s first try Bentham consulted with both the touchie and the in-goal official before awarding the score suggesting he didn’t have that clear view of the event.

From where I was on the Western Terrace I wasn’t actually that much further away from the touchdown than Benthan so stating that he had an “infinitely better view than you” is incorrect.

Now stop being a smart arse and accept that there may be some contention with at least Senior’s try.

Are you still pissed at me for saying that cricket is crap?

I'm still vexed at you for saying its crap!

Re: Linesman : Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:30 pm  

LS16_Rhino wrote:

For Senior’s first try Bentham consulted with both the touchie and the in-goal official before awarding the score suggesting he didn’t have that clear view of the event.

From where I was on the Western Terrace I wasn’t actually that much further away from the touchdown than Benthan so stating that he had an “infinitely better view than you” is incorrect.

Now stop being a smart arse and accept that there may be some contention with at least Senior’s try.

Are you still pissed at me for saying that cricket is crap?

Apologies I was thinking about Ali's try which was right in front of me in the Carnegie Stand. I take the ref's decision as final, nine times out of ten they are right & even when they're not they still are.
Re cricket, I don't care what you think IMV it's the greatest game. You don't so what.