Re: Linesman : Sun Apr 11, 2010 6:54 pm  

Whilst we are on about it, can someone please explain to me the Hull 2nd to last try?

I was in Carnegie so at oppossite end. But the Hull player appeared to knock on the ball, picked up by another Hull player in an offside position, only for Bentham to give 6 more from which they scored the try.

Was it not a knock on?

Re: Linesman : Sun Apr 11, 2010 6:55 pm  

rhinoms wrote:

Hull player flicked out a hand looking for the intercept but it went straight to Hall nothing wrong with it.

As I said..thats what the linesman saw. I'm not disagreeing just I couldn't see whether the Hull player got a touch or not

Re: Linesman : Sun Apr 11, 2010 6:57 pm  

Gotcha wrote:

Whilst we are on about it, can someone please explain to me the Hull 2nd to last try?

I was in Carnegie so at oppossite end. But the Hull player appeared to knock on the ball, picked up by another Hull player in an offside position, only for Bentham to give 6 more from which they scored the try.

Was it not a knock on?

its known as "Benthamitis" a disease only selected people can work out whilst the rest scratch their heads at the end results

Re: Linesman : Sun Apr 11, 2010 6:57 pm  

Gotcha wrote:

Whilst we are on about it, can someone please explain to me the Hull 2nd to last try?

I was in Carnegie so at oppossite end. But the Hull player appeared to knock on the ball, picked up by another Hull player in an offside position, only for Bentham to give 6 more from which they scored the try.

Was it not a knock on?

I saw it the same as you,but i'm also in the Carnegie. South stand certainly seemed to think so

Re: Linesman : Sun Apr 11, 2010 7:00 pm  

Gotcha wrote:

Whilst we are on about it, can someone please explain to me the Hull 2nd to last try?

I was in Carnegie so at oppossite end. But the Hull player appeared to knock on the ball, picked up by another Hull player in an offside position, only for Bentham to give 6 more from which they scored the try.

Was it not a knock on?

Yep Yeamen knocked on mate big error by the flag waver and the whistleblower.

Re: Linesman : Sun Apr 11, 2010 7:17 pm  

I think you should get back in your can lawrie, I was only commenting on two which I was in position to comment on if thats ok? just as you have !!

As I said Hull were well flattered by the 30 points scored, me thinks you will have to improve close to 200% for neext week or your booties will be handed to you again, you will need dads army to compete

Re: Linesman : Sun Apr 11, 2010 7:23 pm  

rhinogonemad wrote:

I think you should get back in your can lawrie, I was only commenting on two which I was in position to comment on if thats ok? just as you have !!

As I said Hull were well flattered by the 30 points scored, me thinks you will have to improve close to 200% for neext week or your booties will be handed to you again, you will need dads army to compete

You do know that loz is a Rhinos fan dont ya?

Re: Linesman : Sun Apr 11, 2010 7:24 pm  

EmmaMur01 wrote:

You do know that loz is a Rhinos fan dont ya?

FAIL

Re: Linesman : Sun Apr 11, 2010 7:27 pm  

rhinogonemad wrote:

I think you should get back in your can lawrie, I was only commenting on two which I was in position to comment on if thats ok? just as you have !!

As I said Hull were well flattered by the 30 points scored, me thinks you will have to improve close to 200% for neext week or your booties will be handed to you again, you will need dads army to compete

you just have proved my point!

take your glasses of next time, might give a more clearer view

Re: Linesman : Sun Apr 11, 2010 7:31 pm  

didn't see the ones at the far end but the ones by hull in the first half did look marginal