: Thu Jul 23, 2009 10:53 pm  

Starbug wrote:

:lol: , link ? as in pictures of steel,concrete,bricks and polish workers ?

These pictures to have Xscape in the backround

stop smoking them funny fags

: Thu Jul 23, 2009 11:04 pm  

Gaslight wrote:

Flattening land ready for the foundations constitutes as work starting on the site

They started doing that in 2003 , how long is it taking , get some JCB's instead of paddies and spades

: Thu Jul 23, 2009 11:07 pm  

Gaslight wrote:

Flattening land ready for the foundations constitutes as work starting on the site

There was something like a 20 page ' discussion ' with Smokey on the VT about whether ' plans ' were part of the process of ' building ' a couple of years back

Till we can see some seats there is nothing

And on the subject of seats , did the RFL change the rul

: Thu Jul 23, 2009 11:12 pm  

tigerbaz wrote:

And how much from the sale of your ground you putting in the pot???

No idea, guess it would depend on any number of factors - cost of the stadium for instance.

: Fri Jul 24, 2009 7:15 am  

Starbug wrote:

There was something like a 20 page ' discussion ' with Smokey on the VT about whether ' plans ' were part of the process of ' building ' a couple of years back

Till we can see some seats there is nothing

And on the subject of seats , did the RFL change the rul

By God, you're fecking tiresome, like a stuck record. Leigh didn't get into SL, get over it and take your conspiracy/paranoid theories with you.

: Fri Jul 24, 2009 7:40 am  

ParanoidAndroid wrote:

By God, you're fecking tiresome, like a stuck record. Leigh didn't get into SL, get over it and take your conspiracy/paranoid theories with you.

Not me , you on the other hand

: Fri Jul 24, 2009 8:32 am  

Gaslight wrote:

Flattening land ready for the foundations constitutes as work starting on the site

I thought the flattening of the land was paid for by English heritage to get rid of a load of contaminated spoil,not for the new ground.

: Fri Jul 24, 2009 8:38 am  

tigerbaz wrote:

And how much from the sale of your ground you putting in the pot???

You really need to think before you open your mouth, that way you dont leave yourself open to comments that will once again disrupt the thread

: Fri Jul 24, 2009 9:30 am  

chissitt wrote:

You really need to think before you open your mouth, that way you dont leave yourself open to comments that will once again disrupt the thread

No i dont! am just pointing out that the only team that will gain out of any ground share will be wakey, since you have already sold BV and spent most of it!!

: Fri Jul 24, 2009 9:54 am  

SaintsFan wrote:

Would it be possible for Cas and Wakey to share a stadium but maintain individual identities within that ground? For instance, by having a Wakefield end and a Castleford end, with separate changing rooms and tunnel on to the pitch and identical corporate and other facilities so that each club could operate separately within the same overall physical space?

No. The bottom line is there is no location anywhere which would be agreeable to both parties. For Castleford, it has to be IN Castleford, but for Wakefield that's unacceptable so we left deadlocked. No matter how cleverly you design the interior or split the functionality, the bottom line is we'd never ever agree on where to build it.

SaintsFan wrote:

I cannot see how Wakefield Council can endorse and/or help finance two entirely separate rugby league clubs within its own borough. Apart from anything else, the council tax payers would go ape!

As I understand it, it was Wakey's hope that the Council would build them a stadium west of the city centre but (again, as I understand it) it has never been the case that Castleford's stadium would be paid for with public money. The Tigers have done a deal with WMDC which allows the Council to incorporate a number of facilities which they would have had to provide anyway into the design of the new stadium, but that is quite different from the Council financing our stadium. Ultimately it actually saves the Council money rather than costing them.

Let's be under no illusions here. While Wakey have ummed an ahhed over Durkar, Ossett, Thornes Park and god knows what else, Castleford have been quietly working away on the Glasshoughton Project. Years of work is now nearing fruition for Cas, and there is no way on earth that they will walk away from it at this stage, purely to back Wakey's proposed dream at Stanley.

So please, once and for all.... drop it.