Re: Stadium Development and MDBTYD Thread : Thu Dec 16, 2010 6:07 pm  

What i'm a little confused about is that i thought Wakey had a plan B in place no matter what happened with NM so why is there so much speculation about what it is ?

Surely they can just announce it.

Good luck to them anyway, hope the can get sorted and a franchise agreed (obviously not at our expense !!)I think SL will be a worse place without either of us. I'm also not gonna count my chickens until FPP has been put in and granted and building started.

Re: Stadium Development and MDBTYD Thread : Thu Dec 16, 2010 6:27 pm  

WallTiger wrote:

What i'm a little confused about is that i thought Wakey had a plan B in place no matter what happened with NM so why is there so much speculation about what it is ?

Surely they can just announce it.

Good luck to them anyway, hope the can get sorted and a franchise agreed (obviously not at our expense !!)I think SL will be a worse place without either of us. I'm also not gonna count my chickens until FPP has been put in and granted and building started.

Yes I have to say I am thinking along those lines too while ever wakey are around and we have not started the build anything could still happen. I think we must get the planning in asap and at least get the pitch laid to show a start.

Re: Stadium Development and MDBTYD Thread : Thu Dec 16, 2010 6:34 pm  

It'd be hilarious if Wakey came crawling over with a begging bowl after telling us where to go when we first proposed a ground share. If they can pay rent, or if they put enough finance into it, I'd accept it. I said that before. But if they turned round now and wanted in on our plans, we'd have to be in the driving seat.

Re: Stadium Development and MDBTYD Thread : Thu Dec 16, 2010 6:37 pm  

BD wrote:

It'd be hilarious if Wakey came crawling over with a begging bowl after telling us where to go when we first proposed a ground share. If they can pay rent, or if they put enough finance into it, I'd accept it. I said that before. But if they turned round now and wanted in on our plans, we'd have to be in the driving seat.

As nice as it would be I dont think it will ever happen, I dont think he wakey board will even consider the idea.

Re: Stadium Development and Ground Share Thread : Thu Dec 16, 2010 9:47 pm  

Inflatable_Armadillo wrote:

I was totally right though and it was most certainly the answer... it was not the answer Wakefield or I hoped for but as I eluded to, the 22nd and the 28 days (although I know they requested and extension beyond that) was important!

...and has I said Wakefield (in my opinion) will not receive full planning permission.

Re: Stadium Development and MDBTYD Thread : Fri Dec 17, 2010 12:33 am  

Oh i say. The air of smugness coming from wakefield seems to have suddenly gone.

Intersesting Wakey Statement : Fri Dec 17, 2010 1:06 pm  

What is this all about now? It raises more questions than it answers. http://wakefieldwildcats.co.uk/2010/12/ ... ification/

What is this all about now? It raises more questions than it answers. http://wakefieldwildcats.co.uk/2010/12/ ... ification/

Re: Intersesting Wakey Statement : Fri Dec 17, 2010 1:13 pm  

It means "please dont kick us out of sl rfl, we have a little bit of the funding sorted for the stadium," (even though our planning application has gone to the dogs)

Re: Intersesting Wakey Statement : Fri Dec 17, 2010 1:25 pm  

Certainly have no idea why they feel people need this clarification. It's been widely publicised since it was first announced that the council weren't giving cash to either club.

Re: Stadium Development and MDBTYD Thread : Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:30 pm  

Now this - I know it's a rumour, but it could be for real. http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A78515562

Now this - I know it's a rumour, but it could be for real. http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A78515562