Re: cas v leeds : Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:09 pm  

frank5613 wrote:

It was the Correct attendance unlike what was at your end of the common, your seats were half empty, your pigeon holes had hardly any one in them, for a place what supposedly holds 12,000 there was a hell of a lot of room.

Luckily Hull KR fans came in numbers to bolster the coffers, paying full rather than a tenner

Pathetic, enjoy your win, don't sit back fretting about what we're doing.

Re: cas v leeds : Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:23 pm  

frank5613 wrote:

It was the Correct attendance unlike what was at your end of the common, your seats were half empty, your pigeon holes had hardly any one in them, for a place what supposedly holds 12,000 there was a hell of a lot of room.

Luckily Hull KR fans came in numbers to bolster the coffers, paying full rather than a tenner

We have more fans than you now and that's a FACT! Learn to live with it!

Re: cas v leeds : Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:43 pm  

[quote="deeHell"]We have more fans than you now and that's a FACT! Learn to live with it![/quote]

I can. A fact I would find hard to live with would be us fielding one homegrown player and Wakey having 9 in the 17 which beat the champions.

Re: cas v leeds : Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:46 pm  

frank5613 wrote:

It was the Correct attendance unlike what was at your end of the common, your seats were half empty, your pigeon holes had hardly any one in them, for a place what supposedly holds 12,000 there was a hell of a lot of room.

Luckily Hull KR fans came in numbers to bolster the coffers, paying full rather than a tenner

I think there were 9,200 at Wakefield on Saturday night and we had just over 9,100 on Sunday.

Re: cas v leeds : Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:57 pm  

think arguing over 80(ish) fans is hiarious.

if it was 3000 then there's an issue

I'd like to think those 80 could've been made up on Sunday at cas if it wasn't -30, blowing a gale, and sheet rain for most of the morning/afternoon.

But christ, we both won! All smiles and happiness for a week!

Re: cas v leeds : Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:13 pm  

DAVE@CAS1990 wrote:

think arguing over 80(ish) fans is hiarious.

if it was 3000 then there's an issue

I'd like to think those 80 could've been made up on Sunday at cas if it wasn't -30, blowing a gale, and sheet rain for most of the morning/afternoon.

But christ, we both won! All smiles and happiness for a week!

Hallelujah to that DAVE@CAS1990, a reasoned statement! Nice one.

Re: cas v leeds : Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:18 pm  

JINJER wrote:

Hallelujah to that DAVE@CAS1990, a reasoned statement! Nice one.

Re: cas v leeds : Wed Feb 13, 2013 3:45 pm  

frank5613 wrote:

I did not bring the attendances up it was your very own vasty,
he posted an in correct attendance, so i told him the correct number, what he disagreed with,...take it up with him

err no I didn't old lad, you did.

You mis understood my smiley on the Roger Daley comment because you are either not very bright or ultra defensive.

The smiley was aimed at Rogers inflate idea as to what the score would be in Leeds favour - most reasonable folk would have got that. our attendance figure is of little interest to me unless we are getting a cut, which may well be the next Cas conspiracy theory.

Go back and re read the thread Frank!!!

Re: cas v leeds : Wed Feb 13, 2013 3:59 pm  

also TO THE MODS OF THIS SITE...

I seem to have been banned from the Leeds section of the forum, due to an edited message simply saying "racism is not cool"

anyone familiar with my posts will be aware that I would not put anything of that nature on here - I have since changed my password in case of any potential "hack"

if this could be reviewed I'd be very grateful (though I aren't particualrly fussed about posting on the whinos board) - so either that or the post be deleted, as I don't want to be associated with it.

muchos gracias

Re: cas v leeds : Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:03 pm  

DAVE@CAS1990 wrote:

also TO THE MODS OF THIS SITE...

I seem to have been banned from the Leeds section of the forum, due to an edited message simply saying "racism is not cool"

anyone familiar with my posts will be aware that I would not put anything of that nature on here - I have since changed my password in case of any potential "hack"

if this could be reviewed I'd be very grateful (though I aren't particualrly fussed about posting on the whinos board) - so either that or the post be deleted, as I don't want to be associated with it.

muchos gracias

It was anti-Semitic, not racist.