“our first choice starting 17 is easily a top eight side” Now that has to be a classic statement if I’ve ever heard it! Every SL team (at least from next season) could say that about themselves. But as I’ve already said the season isn’t about your first 17 it’s about your squad!
Your loss of form after the first 7 games was nothing to do with injuries it was the fact you had a favourable fixture schedule you started with. All the teams you played was in poor form, you would of no doubt won them games with squad that finished the season. Just as you would of lost the games you did with your strongest team. The reason you started losing was simply because you was playing better/inform teams.
Do you wipe your mouth when all that poop comes out of it ?????????????
Woooohoooo the scroungers have survived on the back of the welsh collapse and now are worldbeaters
The fact you think your opinions are resonable and any opinions you disagree with as less so speaks volumes about yourself.
Your obsessive hatred of Cas has always been plain for all to see on this forum and probably the reason why nobody will take your opinions seriously or accept you as anything more than a troll. Similarly your obsession with Fully is something he should probably be flattered by - it seems this would prevent you from appreciating a reasoned view if it smacked you across the face. It's a wonder you have any time left for obsessing about the team you claim to support.
bren2k wrote:
No, he was right the first time Fully - you're a complete loving hypocrite.
Semi Tadulala by the way - can't see what he'd add to CT; lovely fella, good friends with God, but over the hill.
There's absolutely no need to get personal - although you have an obsessive hatred of all things Cas; and a similar obsession with Fully as the troll quoted above.
Ultimately you've both contributed to a pretty major thread drift which I'm not going to be wasting my time cleaning up. The next steps are simply to re-read the AUP and stop derailing threads, or else...
I can understand the Wakey fans being bullish about next season, they have put together a useful looking squad.
However a cart load of new signings didn't help Bradford & Salford last season, and many pundits had them as top 8 shoe ins...we won't know until next february.
I think both sets of supporters should just sit back,shut up and wait for the new season. Every thread turns into the usual bitch fest and its getting boring
“our first choice starting 17 is easily a top eight side” Now that has to be a classic statement if I’ve ever heard it! Every SL team (at least from next season) could say that about themselves. But as I’ve already said the season isn’t about your first 17 it’s about your squad!
Your loss of form after the first 7 was nothing to do with injuries it was the fact you had a favourable fixture schedule you started with. All the teams you played was in poor form, you would of no doubt won them games with squad that finished the season. Just as you would of lost the games you did with your strongest team. The reason you started losing was simply because you was playing better/inform teams.
So whenever we win games we are lucky because the teams are out of form and we are lucky but when he have a massive injury list of upto 12 players at a time those teams arent lucky? 0/10.
Disco - Expansion of the game is a good thing, undoubtedly, but in the main what people simply want to assert is that you don't kill the roots to spread the tree.
The Curtism - The battles are fought on the field and the friends are made in the bar. There's no hatred among real men.
So whenever we win games we are lucky because the teams are out of form and we are lucky but when he have a massive injury list of upto 12 players at a time those teams arent lucky? 0/10.
It wouldn't of mattered because you would of lost all the game you did despite who was playing, as I said you were not equipped for the business end of the season...FACT.
waltontiger wrote:
Not down to injuries....
There was a point last season we were struggling to put together a front row! That kicked in our downturn in form, started off by Huby's injury.
I am sure Hull, Kr and Hudds are everyones idea of an easy set of teams to get your season going.
Just look at the form of the them mentioned teams ( at the time you played em), both Hull teams had a poor to average start even we beat them both in that period. Huddersfield are a team with consistency issues. They even lost away to us (in the rain) and to Crusaders.
I wouldn't bother reading this bit, there is nothing interesting, witty or insightful down here, just this collection of boring words explaining that you really are wasting your time browsing this signature in the vain and futile hope that there will be a nugget, nay, a veritable goldmine of witticisms or divine philosophy. In reality, all you're going to get is disappointment, a sense of hopelessness and a random word.
Oh no's, he's used FACT at the end of his sentence, might as well pack in now folks, game over man, game over.
Tell you what cockle, when you can differentiate between opinion and fact, then, and only then, will I attempt to take any points you raise seriously. </patronise>
Oh no's, he's used FACT at the end of his sentence, might as well pack in now folks, game over man, game over.
Tell you what cockle, when you can differentiate between opinion and fact, then, and only then, will I attempt to take any points you raise seriously. </patronise>
It wouldn't of mattered because you would of lost all the game you did despite who was playing, as I said you were not equipped for the business end of the season...FACT.
I suppose your intensive research to conclude that this is fact has included head-to-head analysis of previous game performances of the main protagonists in opposition to each other, combined with those of the missing personnel against the same players. This will also have been done for similar playing conditions and time of year, of course. You will then have calculated the offset in performance and used these data to replicate, by some type of computer modelling system, I suspect, the projected scorelines of the games. I would hope that the information used has been taken from various previous years to compensate for one-off over- and under-performances in the previous encounter that you've used. This, to be honest, sounds like valuable research and I'd dearly love to see the models used and, of course, the raw data collected. Could you post them in response to this comment, please?
Thanks.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 109 guests
REPLY
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.
Use the FULL EDITOR to better format content or upload images, be notified of replies etc...
