Re: Richard vile wright : Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:00 pm  

bigalf wrote:

Can someone please change this thread title?

To what? Richard 'I object (so say Wakefield fans)' Wright.

Re: Richard vile wright : Thu Dec 08, 2011 7:59 am  

As I think has already been said, we would be mightily p'd off if AG similarly intervened in our stadium plans...well I would at least. However in the final analysis I doubt RWs actions will have major impact - although there is a first time for everything.

Re: Richard vile wright : Thu Dec 08, 2011 9:51 am  

smoking monkey wrote:

As I think has already been said, we would be mightily p'd off if AG similarly intervened in our stadium plans...well I would at least. However in the final analysis I doubt RWs actions will have major impact - although there is a first time for everything.

And bye and large they are the thoughts of anyone with any grasp on their sanity.
Its not what he's said, its just the fact that he's commented at all, massive OG for RW in my opinion, and completely avoidable.

Re: Richard vile wright : Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:01 am  

kinleycat wrote:

And bye and large they are the thoughts of anyone with any grasp on their sanity.
Its not what he's said, its just the fact that he's commented at all, massive OG for RW in my opinion, and completely avoidable.

He strikes me as a man that's struggling to hold on, the pressure is getting too much and I my opinion whilst his intent is right his ability to deliver simply isn't.

Saying that what do we do as I don't see a queue of people waiting to take over the club, I Cas fans are honest with themselves I think most would agree.

Re: Richard vile wright : Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:28 am  

smoking monkey wrote:

As I think has already been said, we would be mightily p'd off if AG similarly intervened in our stadium plans...well I would at least. However in the final analysis I doubt RWs actions will have major impact - although there is a first time for everything.

I doubt that any of his comments will have any real influence as this would have all been mentioned anyway.

The reason this conversation keeps going round in circles is because most Cas fans won’t take of the blinkers and accept this point. Why did he have to get involved, especially knowing full well who it was that approached him and what he was been associated with? The wording of the letter made it more clear what the underlying motivations was. To quote “we have made significant progress with our site at Junction 32” I mean come on, that could have been written in 2006 it could still be written in the 2014 franchise application! There has to be some kind of fair play in sport and this just isn’t it, actively and knowingly joining a campaign to stop top class sporting facilities been brought to the game of Rugby League. You now have a Chief Exec whose interests are directly in conflict with what’s best for the game of Rugby League. Not very good.

Dickie has also opened a right can of worms here and he is making a lot off enemies. He has to remember that if the Opus Planning application ever goes in, a PI could well take place. If NM gets passed could you imagine the amount of stirring Sir Rodney could do in that one? Pick your enemies wisely Trickey…..

Re: Richard vile wright : Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:44 am  

deeHell wrote:

I doubt that any of his comments will have any real influence as this would have all been mentioned anyway.

The reason this conversation keeps going round in circles is because most Cas fans won’t take of the blinkers and accept this point. Why did he have to get involved, especially knowing full well who it was that approached him and what he was been associated with? The wording of the letter made it more clear what the underlying motivations was. To quote “we have made significant progress with our site at Junction 32” I mean come on, that could have been written in 2006 it could still be written in the 2014 franchise application! There has to be some kind of fair play in sport and this just isn’t it, actively and knowingly joining a campaign to stop top class sporting facilities been brought to the game of Rugby League. You now have a Chief Exec whose interests are directly in conflict with what’s best for the game of Rugby League. Not very good.

Dickie has also opened a right can of worms here and he is making a lot off enemies. He has to remember that if the Opus Planning application ever goes in, a PI could well take place. If NM gets passed could you imagine the amount of stirring Sir Rodney could do in that one? Pick your enemies wisely Trickey…..

Please dont bundle Most Cas fans in with the people who feel the need to post tripe everyday on here!

Re: Richard vile wright : Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:33 am  

TURFEDOUT wrote:

Did i say they were??

Have you found the link yet -- to the businesses that went bankrupt/brink?

I'll provide a list shortly, but here is a little something for you for now:

Wakefield's new owner, Andrew Glover, whose Spirit of 1873 company brought the club out of administration, revealed yesterday that he, too, intended to voluntarily satisfy some of the creditors.

"It's a brand-new company and none of the old debts are there," Glover told the press conference. "There are elements that I will be honouring, that I feel I want to honour, but I don't want to go into details."

It is thought the old club owed more than £300,000 to HM Revenue and Customs, whose action in bringing a winding-up petition precipitated the decision to go into administration.

The administrators O'Hara and Company sold three players – Sam Obst, Daryl Millard and Dale Ferguson – for undisclosed fees to other Super League clubs during the five days they ran the club to help pay off some of the debt.

Re: Richard vile wright : Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:36 am  

binks wrote:

He strikes me as a man that's struggling to hold on, the pressure is getting too much and I my opinion whilst his intent is right his ability to deliver simply isn't.

Saying that what do we do as I don't see a queue of people waiting to take over the club, I Cas fans are honest with themselves I think most would agree.

I agree, it's bit like us pre AG, everything was done to cover up the cracks and cling to power, but until you find an alternative your stuck with it.
Please don't let it go too far and you end up in admin though, neverdid would go into melt down!!!!!!!!

Re: Richard vile wright : Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:53 pm  

TDT wrote:

I'll provide a list shortly, but here is a little something for you for now:

Wakefield's new owner, Andrew Glover, whose Spirit of 1873 company brought the club out of administration, revealed yesterday that he, too, intended to voluntarily satisfy some of the creditors.

"It's a brand-new company and none of the old debts are there," Glover told the press conference. "There are elements that I will be honouring, that I feel I want to honour, but I don't want to go into details."

It is thought the old club owed more than £300,000 to HM Revenue and Customs, whose action in bringing a winding-up petition precipitated the decision to go into administration.

The administrators O'Hara and Company sold three players – Sam Obst, Daryl Millard and Dale Ferguson – for undisclosed fees to other Super League clubs during the five days they ran the club to help pay off some of the debt.

Very good and your point is?

Everyone is already aware of the above info.

However thanks for reminding every one just what a top guy Andrew Glover is,honouring debts that had nothing to do with him.
He really is a shining example of how a club chairmen should conduct himself.............

I look forward to your list of "lots of businesses" that went bankrupt/to the brink because of Wakefield.

Re: Richard vile wright : Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:56 pm  

TURFEDOUT wrote:

Very good and your point is?

Everyone is already aware of the above info.

However thanks for reminding every one just what a top guy Andrew Glover is,honouring debts that had nothing to do with him.
He really is a shining example of how a club chairmen should conduct himself.............

I look forward to your list of "lots of businesses" that went bankrupt/to the brink because of Wakefield.

Is that the same AG that posted all those tweets about Cas ? People in glass houses