Re: Tadulala : Sun Oct 30, 2011 9:39 pm  

deeHell wrote:

Whether you have a stronger 17 is matter of opinion but you offer no solid evidence to convince that you have a stronger 17. I’ll repeat again because its very significant point I’m making, the 30-ish game season is not played with 17 players, do you not understand the concept of a squad game?

No solid evidence?

Castleford strongest 17 last season 7/7 first games before injuries hit.
Wakefield, near bottom of the league.

Yes, you have improved but our first choice starting 17 is easily a top eight side. Yours is competing for top eight (and yes, that is my opinion on Wakey's squad for the season - challenging for the top eight).

As for the latter point, what relevance did that have to the fact that our strongest 17 is better than yours? In fact, what relevance does it have to the point? Where was I arguing that the season isn't X games long and you need a squad?

Re: Tadulala : Sun Oct 30, 2011 9:42 pm  

deeHell wrote:

Ahh someone else knows him then. No doubt one of the biggest hypocrites on RL Fans!

If you say so cockle. I make reasonable points, I don't just argue for arguments sake. In addition to that, I also give credit where credit is due, something which you lot seem (bar a couple of people) incapable of doing. Never mind.

Re: Tadulala : Sun Oct 30, 2011 10:24 pm  

Fully wrote:

Yes, you have improved but our first choice starting 17 is easily a top eight side. Yours is competing for top eight (and yes, that is my opinion on Wakey's squad for the season - challenging for the top eight).

“our first choice starting 17 is easily a top eight side” Now that has to be a classic statement if I’ve ever heard it! Every SL team (at least from next season) could say that about themselves. But as I’ve already said the season isn’t about your first 17 it’s about your squad!

Fully wrote:

Castleford strongest 17 last season 7/7 first games before injuries hit.
Wakefield, near bottom of the league.

Your loss of form after the first 7 games was nothing to do with injuries it was the fact you had a favourable fixture schedule you started with. All the teams you played was in poor form, you would of no doubt won them games with squad that finished the season. Just as you would of lost the games you did with your strongest team. The reason you started losing was simply because you was playing better/inform teams.

Re: Tadulala : Sun Oct 30, 2011 10:26 pm  

Fully wrote:

If you say so cockle. I make reasonable points, I don't just argue for arguments sake. In addition to that, I also give credit where credit is due, something which you lot seem (bar a couple of people) incapable of doing. Never mind.

The fact you think your opinions are resonable and any opinions you disagree with as less so speaks volumes about yourself.

Re: Tadulala : Sun Oct 30, 2011 10:34 pm  

deeHell wrote:

The fact you think your opinions are resonable and any opinions you disagree with as less so speaks volumes about yourself.

Hit the nail on the head there. Very few posters think so highly of themselves.

Re: Tadulala : Sun Oct 30, 2011 10:43 pm  

imwakefieldtillidie wrote:

Hit the nail on the head there. Very few posters think so highly of themselves.

So you often criticise yourself then? Congrats for being so honest.

My honesty, however, extends to the fact that I do give credit where it is due and make fair and reasonable comments elsewhere.

Re: Tadulala : Sun Oct 30, 2011 11:16 pm  

I can understand the Wakey fans being bullish about next season, they have put together a useful looking squad.

However a cart load of new signings didn't help Bradford & Salford last season, and many pundits had them as top 8 shoe ins...we won't know until next february.

I think both sets of supporters should just sit back,shut up and wait for the new season. Every thread turns into the usual bitch fest and its getting boring

Re: Tadulala : Sun Oct 30, 2011 11:31 pm  

duke street 10 wrote:

I can understand the Wakey fans being bullish about next season, they have put together a useful looking squad.

However a cart load of new signings didn't help Bradford & Salford last season, and many pundits had them as top 8 shoe ins...we won't know until next february.

I think both sets of supporters should just sit back,shut up and wait for the new season. Every thread turns into the usual bitch fest and its getting boring

All started by one of the usual suspects, 15 post into a thread about the merits of Tadulala (who IMO we don't need the sevices of )

newgroundb4cas wrote:

YOu guys haven't really kicked on have you, from last year? Can't believe we allready have a better squad than you allready . Bit slow so far Cas im not trolling its true .

Re: Tadulala : Mon Oct 31, 2011 12:02 am  

Fully wrote:

My honesty, however, extends to the fact that I do give credit where it is due and make fair and reasonable comments elsewhere.

No, he was right the first time Fully - you're a complete loving hypocrite.

Semi Tadulala by the way - can't see what he'd add to CT; lovely fella, good friends with God, but over the hill.

Re: Tadulala : Mon Oct 31, 2011 5:24 am  

bren2k wrote:

No, he was right the first time Fully - you're a complete loving hypocrite.

Semi Tadulala by the way - can't see what he'd add to CT; lovely fella, good friends with God, but over the hill.

Pot calling kettle, bren, but hey ho. I don't care about your opinion nor your mine so let's leave it at that, hey?