Re: Would you ground share? : Fri Oct 14, 2011 12:04 pm  

Dead Man Walking wrote:

I split it.

Ouch, maybe some cream and a plaster.

Re: Would you ground share? : Fri Oct 14, 2011 3:06 pm  

BIGAL1 wrote:

Ouch, maybe some cream and a plaster.

Shouldnt you be over there banning everyone that tells a few truths about the polecats scrounging ??

Re: Would you ground share? : Fri Oct 14, 2011 4:05 pm  

neverdid wrote:

Newmarket within the city boundaries a fair compromise .............................. are you mad ???????

Point of order:
Stanley is not, and never has been, in the city of Wakefield. Other than being a village rather than a town, it's just like cas. Stanley Urban District Council was absorbed by Wakfield District in the 1974 reorganisation, just like Castleford Borough Council.

P.S.
To settle a bet: Did you get your user name from how many times Tricky Dicky has been open and honest about the progress of GH or from how many times Wakefield has finished bottom of superleague?

Re: Would you ground share? : Fri Oct 14, 2011 4:15 pm  

coco the fullback wrote:

Point of order:

P.S.
To settle a bet: Did you get your user name from how many times Tricky Dicky has been open and honest about the progress of GH or from how many times Wakefield has finished bottom of superleague?

Grow up the lot of you, how pathetic is this latest knob measuring contest.

Usual suspects, usual tripe.

The only facts are that none of us know if/when either stadium will be built.

Re: Would you ground share? : Fri Oct 14, 2011 5:32 pm  

neverdid wrote:

Shouldnt you be over there banning everyone that tells a few truths about the polecats scrounging ??

Re: Would you ground share? : Fri Oct 14, 2011 9:01 pm  

binks wrote:

Grow up the lot of you, how pathetic is this latest knob measuring contest.

Usual suspects, usual tripe.

The only facts are that none of us know if/when either stadium will be built.

Usual off-season fayre, nothing of use to talk about, so petty who can p155 highest up a wall contest. I have taken to working during the day instead of reading this forum for a while.

How very tiresome, I would like to actually discuss something really related to rugby league or Castleford, I have tried to post insightful meaningful things on a few discussion threads, before they became tool measuring point scoring crap....... But in the meantime I should say: everybody who plays for Hull KR is from down under, I hate Leeds and Wakey are poor and Fev, well, dont get me started....... YAWN.

Re: Would you ground share? : Sat Oct 15, 2011 9:27 am  

BIGAL1 wrote:

:SUBMISSION:

Just as i thought ....... pathetic

Re: Would you ground share? : Sat Oct 15, 2011 9:39 am  

coco the fullback wrote:

P.S.
To settle a bet: Did you get your user name from how many times Tricky Dicky has been open and honest about the progress of GH or from how many times Wakefield has finished bottom of superleague?

Both losers im afraid, the name is about how many times wakey paid a debt, and how many times Cas went into administration.

Always happy to help those who are not as bright as they should be

Re: Would you ground share? : Sat Oct 15, 2011 4:16 pm  

Wouldn't groundshare cos that's a step away from the 2 clubs merging into one.

The thing that winds me up is how fans of certain clubs that are tennants of football clubs gloat about their wonderful stadiums and criticise the likes of Cas and Wakey for not having the luck to be in the vicinity of a football ground they can use. But go all quiet when they have to make alternative arrangements because their landlords (the football club) decide its inconvenient for them to use their ground. eg. when relaying the pitch or because the football club has got a game that weekend.

To my mind when considering the ground aspect of a franchise bid a point should be lost if you have had to play at an alternative ground in the previous franchise period having effectively been kicked out by the football club. Wigan & Huddersfield wouldn't be so cocky then....

Re: Would you ground share? : Sat Oct 15, 2011 5:58 pm  

Cecil B wrote:

Wouldn't groundshare cos that's a step away from the 2 clubs merging into one.
The thing that winds me up is how fans of certain clubs that are tennants of football clubs gloat about their wonderful stadiums and criticise the likes of Cas and Wakey for not having the luck to be in the vicinity of a football ground they can use. But go all quiet when they have to make alternative arrangements because their landlords (the football club) decide its inconvenient for them to use their ground. eg. when relaying the pitch or because the football club has got a game that weekend.
To my mind when considering the ground aspect of a franchise bid a point should be lost if you have had to play at an alternative ground in the previous franchise period having effectively been kicked out by the football club. Wigan & Huddersfield wouldn't be so cocky then....

Absolutely, the franchise system should reward clubs for owning rather than being tenants, just like they did for being geographically far away from another club.
Clubs such as ours (if we ever find out who owns BV) are penslised all ways round.