: Sun Jun 28, 2009 4:13 pm  

deeHell wrote:

A 50/50 maybe, so was the possible obstruction in the 2nd half that went the way of Cas. Another 50/50 was the Catalans try disallowed under the post, you won't moan about these because you have them rose tinted glasses on. As for the Catalans alleged double movement, read the rule book he went over in one complete motion. Not at any occasion did he raise his arm to project the ball over the line.

Since when did your mate sat at home become an authority on the game. I think you belive what you want to belive.

You lost because the best team won, accept it and move on.

Look you f***in tool at no point have i even remotely said the best team lost. i have moved on i am not even moaning about the loss read my post on the first page infact i'll save you the trouble..

''Ian smith like it or not made no bad decisions, ok some were pedantic but all were correct at that moment in time and to the letter of the law.....
i hate to admit defeat but once again cas were second best YET AGAIN''

do you have to get up really early to be the moron you are, or AGAIN are you so bored and unsatisfied on your own pathetic site that you have to come on here for some stimulation infact id say you’ll go blind with all the stimulation you and you waky mates do on here. its a shame the londonscholorbroncoquins didn’t f***in stuff you just to keep your smug 5h*t face off this site you bell end......oh and for the record ask Marshman I am far from having rose tinted glasses on. and my mate is an official RFL ref been on the course and to the letter of the law he is right I am wrong. but like any game we have seen these decisions go either way because the final decision is made by a human. look at the MM Leeds V Bradford game.....

: Sun Jun 28, 2009 4:34 pm  

sgt bilko, what a numpty. you have very short memory as always. tv game v leeds, burrows scores try from more like a treble movement than a double movement, webb collects ball over try line and drops to the ground, voluntary tackle as blatant as you are likely to see, kirk dixon taken out in mid air, ablett throws him self to the ground at play the ball, my oh my. tv game v warrington morley does blatant trip, nothing said or done, that was only one of many things that warrington got away with, then on tv again last night, lots of dubious goings on, and they say things even out, i dont think so.

: Sun Jun 28, 2009 5:08 pm  

[quote="Dead Man Walking"]Look what's crawled out of the gutter. [/quote
Truth hurts old boy

: Sun Jun 28, 2009 5:33 pm  

sgtwilko wrote:

For the owen no try which was a correct call owen lost control of the ball before the line! And for the try you thought was a double movement, mcgoldrick pulled the player over the line as he tried to get under the ball! Pelo's movement never halted and he didnt make a second movement with the ball carrying hand to score the try, it was a lunge with his body which alllowed and is not what double movement is about, the second movment has to come from the arm and pelo didn't make one. So no double movement. HTH

I'm still unconvinced by Pelo's try, but that's life and decisions go against you. Just have to live with it.

: Sun Jun 28, 2009 5:35 pm  

jungleman wrote:

sgt bilko, what a numpty. you have very short memory as always. tv game v leeds, burrows scores try from more like a treble movement than a double movement,

Stop reading after this. What a load of tripe.

: Sun Jun 28, 2009 6:25 pm  

Through out the season decisions go for you and decisions go against you.
Where you are after 27 rounds is a true picture of how good you are or how poor you are.

: Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:13 pm  

I would have been gutted if Pelos try had been scored against us - no way was it not a double movement.

But then again, I'd have been more gutted if we'd scored it and had it chalked off - he bounced over the line and did NOT make a conscious double movement.

As a RL fan, I reserve the right to display considerable bias in the interpretation of the rules - in this case, I'm not right bothered 'cos it didn't involve my team.

I agree whole heartedly about the high shots - along with forward passes they are a blight on the game.

As for Cas - when you can get a decent pack and if you can keep your backs you'll have something to shout about, meanwhile you're just getting beat up too easily.

: Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:44 pm  

Fully wrote:

I'm still unconvinced by Pelo's try, but that's life and decisions go against you. Just have to live with it.

He impacted with the ground and bounced over the line. I didn't feel that he moved the ball carrying arm.

The problem was that we seemed to have every 50/50 decision go against us and in the heat of the moment the fans got frustrated. I would say that most if not all of them were the correct decision, but fans are partisan and will believe 50/50 decisions should favour their team.

: Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:46 pm  

tigerman1+1 wrote:

Look you f***in tool at no point have i even remotely said the best team lost. i have moved on i am not even moaning about the loss read my post on the first page infact i'll save you the trouble..

''Ian smith like it or not made no bad decisions, ok some were pedantic but all were correct at that moment in time and to the letter of the law.....
i hate to admit defeat but once again cas were second best YET AGAIN''

do you have to get up really early to be the moron you are, or AGAIN are you so bored and unsatisfied on your own pathetic site that you have to come on here for some stimulation infact id say you’ll go blind with all the stimulation you and you waky mates do on here. its a shame the londonscholorbroncoquins didn’t f***in stuff you just to keep your smug 5h*t face off this site you bell end......oh and for the record ask Marshman I am far from having rose tinted glasses on. and my mate is an official RFL ref been on the course and to the letter of the law he is right I am wrong. but like any game we have seen these decisions go either way because the final decision is made by a human. look at the MM Leeds V Bradford game.....

What an objectionable and loathsome individual you are. Cant you conduct a discussion without the insessant abuse to other posters' that dont agree with you. its the Cas board not tigerman11's and anybody what comes on here are met with a torent of abuse from you. Are you really that uneducated that you have to substitute reason with the filth that you purvey from that sesspit of a mouth. You need to learn a few manners old boy and to conduct yourself with a bit more dignity and civility. It cost nothing to be polite.

: Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:50 pm  

Fully wrote:

Stop reading after this. What a load of tripe.

Cheers mate!! We can debate we can disagree but we don't need to go down that route!!! Massive respect to you bro!! Proper rl fan!! Leg !!