Re: New Stadium : Fri Apr 03, 2009 1:23 pm  

vastman wrote:

Ditto Westerman, it's just an opinion which some Cas fans take personally. People should read the posts I put before the become defensive and over react, that of course will never happen.

Wahey!!

Admit your undying love for the lad Vasty!


Come out of your closet!

: Fri Apr 03, 2009 1:37 pm  

C.o.C_is_Back wrote:

i have seen nothing to sugget any work has re-started

When did work actually start? I was under the impression you needed full planning permission before any work can begin.

: Fri Apr 03, 2009 1:44 pm  

deeHell wrote:

When did work actually start? I was under the impression you needed full planning permission before any work can begin.

Groundworks started last year.

: Fri Apr 03, 2009 2:09 pm  

jourdmart wrote:

Groundworks started last year.

I haven't inspected the site personally, but I'm told that there are no groundworks as such. What is in place is purely basic road, utilities, drainage, power etc. These could be used for a stadium but equally for a factory or a supermarket. Calling these groundworks is IMHO pushing it a wee bit.

However you are further than us because you have a site earmarked and that site is now served by road, power and water - which is a position I would't mind us being in.

Money is your ONLY issue - but it's a biggy!

: Fri Apr 03, 2009 2:10 pm  

deeHell wrote:

When did work actually start? I was under the impression you needed full planning permission before any work can begin.

Full planning permission on this site is a rubber stamp job and has never been in serious doubt.

: Fri Apr 03, 2009 2:19 pm  

vastman wrote:

I haven't inspected the site personally, but I'm told that there are no groundworks as such. What is in place is purely basic road, utilities, drainage, power etc. These could be used for a stadium but equally for a factory or a supermarket. Calling these groundworks is IMHO pushing it a wee bit...

Which are the start of groundworks, hence groundworks started last year....

: Fri Apr 03, 2009 2:41 pm  

jourdmart wrote:

Which are the start of groundworks, hence groundworks started last year....

You implied they were for the stadium, that may not be the case - it's a small matter I know

: Fri Apr 03, 2009 2:50 pm  

vastman wrote: You implied they were for the stadium, that may not be the case - it's a small matter I know Taken as granted, judging by the title of the thread. See old, outdated, and slightly annoying link given the lack of updates and current economic climate. Linky ("I've seen a sign, brother!")

vastman wrote: You implied they were for the stadium, that may not be the case - it's a small matter I know Taken as granted, judging by the title of the thread. See old, outdated, and slightly annoying link given the lack of updates and current economic climate. Linky ("I've seen a sign, brother!")

: Fri Apr 03, 2009 2:50 pm  

this goundwork is taking some finishing

: Fri Apr 03, 2009 2:53 pm  

vastman wrote:

You implied they were for the stadium, that may not be the case - it's a small matter I know

TBH he implied nothing of the sort. Any implication that they were for a stadium came from your good self. The question was asked: "When did work actually start?" to which the reply was given "Groundworks started last year."

The only implication that a stadium was to be built on these groundworks came from your good self.

It's a tiny matter I know