Re: Richard vile wright : Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:43 pm  

Why are they still being precious over all of this? He's done nothing wrong and to think the RFL will do anything is a joke

Ah well, anything for a good moan eh?

Now can we lock this thread please?

Re: Richard vile wright : Wed Dec 07, 2011 7:01 pm  

bren2k wrote:

Because whilst his delivery may have been inept and clumsy, his intent was clear.

Today's statement only adds to the impression of a sad, desperate and rather pathetic little man; one could almost feel sorry for him, given that his position is likely to get even more uncomfortable when Red Hall decides how to respond to a SL Chairman using gutter tactics to damage another SL club's chances of delivering a shiny stadium.

I suspect that amongst the RL community, RW will soon become persona non-gratis; there'll be blood on t'carpet, you mark my words.

Shouldn't that be Yorkcourt delivering a shiny stadium for Wakefield so they can build warehouses on greenbelt land?

Sorry,couldn't resist...anyway we might end up there as well:shock:

Re: Richard vile wright : Wed Dec 07, 2011 7:07 pm  

It's like handbags at 10 paces....come on grow up the lot of yeh!

Draw a difference between passionate and pathetic!

Until either of our teams start to actually see bricks being stacked into the shape of a stadium, lets just wish both teams all the best and move on!

Re: Richard vile wright : Wed Dec 07, 2011 8:04 pm  

i am not sure that RW has not just scored a major own goal. Regardless of whether what he has said is right or wrong, the fact he has stuck his nose into someone elses business may come back to bite him in the ass.

particularly from someone who is currently trying to raise support for his own plans.

personally i could not care less about whether or not wheldon road gets a supermarket, or at least i didnt until yesterday.

today i would happily object to him putting up a shed in his back garden.

Re: Richard vile wright : Wed Dec 07, 2011 8:22 pm  

bren2k wrote:

Because whilst his delivery may have been inept and clumsy, his intent was clear.

Today's statement only adds to the impression of a sad, desperate and rather pathetic little man; one could almost feel sorry for him, given that his position is likely to get even more uncomfortable when Red Hall decides how to respond to a SL Chairman using gutter tactics to damage another SL club's chances of delivering a shiny stadium.

I suspect that amongst the RL community, RW will soon become persona non-gratis; there'll be blood on t'carpet, you mark my words.

Or so you keep believing.

But whilst you let bitterness, anti-Cas attitude etc etc rather than let common sense prevail then I suppose this will always be your reaction.

I can understand your concern; your points are flawed.

Re: Richard vile wright : Wed Dec 07, 2011 9:21 pm  

I love all this holier than thou stuff coming from the Wildcats trolls.... what was it Glover said about Cas earlier this year? Or have we conveniently forgotten about that?

RW merely clarified, when asked, his comments from earlier in the year.

At least he didn't go round slagging off Wakefield for no good reason.

And with that, farewell to you all.

This was a place I came to so that I could chat about rugby amongst friends. If I wanted to listen to people assassinating each others' characters, I'd sit in front of the telly and watch the soaps, or go to the pub and listen to women slagging of their so called "friends" behind their backs.

Sorry, but it's got to the stage where I can't stand it any more.

Good night nurse.

Re: Richard vile wright : Wed Dec 07, 2011 9:33 pm  

Fully wrote:

I can understand your concern; your points are flawed.

We shall see.

Re: Richard vile wright : Wed Dec 07, 2011 9:43 pm  

Georgie Best on a Bloomer wrote:

I love all this holier than thou stuff coming from the Wildcats trolls.... what was it Glover said about Cas earlier this year? Or have we conveniently forgotten about that?

RW merely clarified, when asked, his comments from earlier in the year.

At least he didn't go round slagging off Wakefield for no good reason.

And with that, farewell to you all.

This was a place I came to so that I could chat about rugby amongst friends. If I wanted to listen to people assassinating each others' characters, I'd sit in front of the telly and watch the soaps, or go to the pub and listen to women slagging of their so called "friends" behind their backs.

Sorry, but it's got to the stage where I can't stand it any more.

Good night nurse.

Easiest thing is to ride it out mate. It's the off-season so naturally the crap always sticks around because there's nothing else to discuss or moan about.

Re: Richard vile wright : Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:26 pm  

Georgie Best on a Bloomer wrote:

I love all this holier than thou stuff coming from the Wildcats trolls.... what was it Glover said about Cas earlier this year? Or have we conveniently forgotten about that?

RW merely clarified, when asked, his comments from earlier in the year.

At least he didn't go round slagging off Wakefield for no good reason.

And with that, farewell to you all.

This was a place I came to so that I could chat about rugby amongst friends. If I wanted to listen to people assassinating each others' characters, I'd sit in front of the telly and watch the soaps, or go to the pub and listen to women slagging of their so called "friends" behind their backs.

Sorry, but it's got to the stage where I can't stand it any more.

Good night nurse.

Sleep it off. Wake up refreshed and don't let them get to you - or they win - you know it makes sense!!

Re: Richard vile wright : Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:28 pm  

Can someone please change this thread title?